#2577 - Gregory Forth

0:00This episode is presented by Searchlight Pictures' Wild Horse 9. Shortly before Chile's 1973 coup, two CIA agents, played by John Malkovich and Sam Rockwell, find their mission on Easter Island, spiraling into a web of conspiracies, unexpected alliances, and chaos. Wild Horse 9, only in theaters Friday. Get tickets now. This episode is brought to you by the Farmer's Dog. Here's a fun fact. Research shows that dogs who maintain a healthy weight can live up to two and a half years longer on average than dogs who are overweight. Isn't that wild and also kind of obvious at the same time? So why is feeding vague scoops of ultra-processed kibble still the status quo for most dog owners? Healthy alternatives exist, and trust me, I know. I buy one, the Farmer's Dog. I use it for both my

0:53dogs. They love it. They eat it up quick. It smells good to them. It smells good to me. It's human-grade food. The Farmer's Dog makes fresh food for dogs, and my dogs love it. Their recipes are made with real meat and fresh vegetables that are gently cooked to retain vital nutrients. They also portion out the meals to your dog's nutritional needs, which helps avoid overfeeding and makes weight management easier. And isn't getting more time with our four-legged best friend something every dog owner wants? The answer to that is yes, obviously. So try the Farmer's Dog today and get 50% off your first box of fresh, healthy food. Plus, get free shipping. Just go to thefarmersdog.com slash rogan.

1:39This offer is for new customers only. Think DraftKings isn't available where you live? Think again. DraftKings, an official partner of the NBA, is now available in all 50 states. Follow your favorite NBA stars with tons of player markets as the season unfolds. Plus, new customers get three months of NBA League Pass on us so you can catch more NBA action anytime, anywhere. Download the DraftKings Sports app today and use code ROGAN. New DraftKings customers spend five and get 200 in total bonuses plus three months of NBA League Pass on us. That's code ROGAN in partnership with DraftKings. The crown is yours. Event trading offered by DraftKings Predictions, a CFTC registered futures commission merchant.

2:28Trading involves risk of loss. Market availability varies. Eligibility restrictions apply. $50 every seven days via click to claim issued in non-withdrawable predictions dollars that expire in one year. Terms at DKNG.co slash predictions promo. Limited time offer. Joe Rogan podcast, check it out. The Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out. The Joe Rogan Experience. Train by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day. Thank you very much for being here. I'm really excited to talk to you. I am fascinated by this little hobbit creature, this Homo floriensis. Am I saying it right? Floresiensis? Floresiensis. Yeah, so it's like flora and floriensis. Am I saying it right? Florence. Floresiensis. Floresiensis.

3:06Yeah, so it's like flora and then ziensis. Right. I've been fascinated from 2003 when it was announced. Well, when was it announced? They discovered it in 2003? September 2003, announced October 2004. So for people that don't know what we're talking about is the supposed hobbit people from the island of Flores, a very small, tiny, it's in the homo genus, right? That's right. A relative of human beings. That's a little fella right there. Fair enough. Yeah, quite good. What is fascinating about your work is that you were on that island quite a bit before that, and you were investigating the possibility of this existing a long time before that. Yeah, no, that's correct. I first began field research on flores as an anthropologist, a cultural anthropologist, in 1984, I was interested in the people and the culture and the languages generally.

4:11But quite early in my stay, in fact, in 1984, during my first visit, I heard about these small hominoid human-like creatures, which were known locally. Actually, at that time, I was working right in the central part of the island, a place called Nage. And the Nage people, according to the Nage people, there were a group of these who used to live close by in a cave high up on a nearby volcano. But they had become extinct about 200, 300 years previously. So in that particular area, that particular part of Flores, they weren't supposed to be around anymore. But then subsequent to that visit, I began to hear about similar creatures further to the east in a place called Leo. And those are the ones I write about in the book.

5:12Yeah, in the book you discuss two distinct, at least possible, different species. Yeah. One of them being Homo floresiensis and the other one being this one from Leo. No. Well, in a way, you could say that. I mean, there's Homo Floresiensis, which lived on the island of Flores for a long time and must have lived in places other than the single discovery site. And then there are the claims, the descriptions offered by Leo people about creatures they say are still around, rare, but still present in their territory, in which some people claim to have seen and have given quite vivid description of. And they seem very similar. If I may just expand a bit. Please. There has been discovered after a deliberate search by paleoanthropologists, if you'll

6:16appreciate that distinction, also in the central part of Flores. In fact, in a place where decades ago there were discovered stegodons, kind of primitive elephant bones in large numbers. And there was evidence that something had, if not killed these things, these stegodons had at least eaten them, eaten their carcasses. A very long, intensive study was done in, what, the 2000s into the 20-teens, looking for some kind of human, some kind of hominid remains. And finally, after a concentrated effort, they found pieces of jaw, pieces of teeth that belonged to something far older than Floresiensis, going back about 700,000 years ago and contemporaneous with what were taken to be stone tools, which is what kind of set them in motion in the

7:32first place, which were even smaller than Floresiensis. And it is kind of presumed that these are possible ancestors of Thereseensis. Again, you know, going back further, hundreds of thousands of years. 700,000, 600,000, 700,000, something in that. Wow. Yeah, but there's also stone tool evidence or stones taken to be possible tools that takes us back even further to like a million years ago, maybe even earlier. I mean, there's still a big mystery as to how these things ever got on the island. Right. Yeah. And are these stone tools clearly formed, like an arrowhead or a spearhead, or are they ambiguous? Some of them. You know, this is not my area. I should confess straight away. But some of them are ambiguous.

8:30There have been different interpretations. Some authorities in, you know, paleoanthropology, archaeology would suggest that they're not artifacts at all. They're not things that have been made by any hominin. So here's, Jamie pulled up some examples from Indonesia. And this is some potential tools that they believe Homo floresiensis used. And you can see they are tool-like, but it's a little odd. It's hard to say. Could be just flakes of chips of stone. Well, to mention right away there is that there was some overlap between Floriziensis and ourselves, Homo sapiens. And it is a well known generalization certainly in that part of the world that you can't distinguish species on the basis of stone tool

9:34industries as they're called in other words you need skeletal evidence in close association with anything that is a stone tool or might be to say what species probably made these things. So, yeah, none of these can we securely attribute to Homo phrysiensis. There have been some fascinating recent studies, actually, on stegodon bones close to the location of the discovery site. Is that a pygmy elephant? Is that a small elephant? Yeah, those would have been the ones that they preyed on or scavenged. Yeah, a pygmy stegodon, but the size of a cow. So if you can think of an elephant the size of a cow. So if you can think of an elephant to the size of a cow. Still pretty formidable if you're only three feet,

10:30three and a half feet tall. Or four, yeah. But then again, I mean, the recent interpretations, analysis has suggested that these stegodons, which may have been consumed by Florisiensis, were killed not by Florisiensis, not hunted by Florisiensis, but instead were killed by Komodo dragons, which is the world's largest lizard. growing up to 10 feet long and a formidable animal. Venom glands, you know, terrifically sharp teeth and a deadly tail. So they were probably scavenging or potentially scavenging what was left. That's the idea. And anything that could be taken for a cut mark, well, the bones that have been studied, they show marks, but mostly from dragon's teeth, Komodo dragon teeth, or Komodo monitor teeth, to use another name. Those that don't look like Komodo dragon teeth marks have been interpreted as,

11:50yeah, possible stone tool marks used by Floriziensis, but merely to scrape meat off the bones, not to kill the animal. But were there humans living on the island of Flores at the same time? If I'm not mistaken, well, when Floresiensis was discovered, the oldest date for Homo sapiens on the island was 11,000 years ago. Oh, wow. Whereas now, I think that's been pushed back to 50,000 or so. So it coinc signs, right? So this overlap, is it possible that it was humans that were predating on these pygmy elephants? That's certainly possible, yeah. Which would... Would leave... Yeah, although, again, if I've got this right and if I'm up to date on this, I'm not sure that there are clear evidence. There's clear evidence from bones that any of the elephants were killed by Homo sapiens.

12:56Right, like spear marks on the rib cage. Well, yeah, cut marks when you're butchering. That sort of is the big guy. So it's more like something smaller and smaller tools just scraping meat away. Yeah. Which would indicate the little animals. So the date of the actual group that they found that was in that cave, was it 50,000, 60,000 years old? How old were they? Well, of course, initially it was reckoned they were only 12,000, 13,000 years old. That's the youngest ones. Right, right, right. But that was a big problem for the paleos. That was a big problem. They said so as well. Well, it would be a real big problem if they found a live one today. That would be a real big problem. No, you're certainly correct there. Although one of the senior

13:50investigators, the original find, said memor ago, or even a bit older, was more surprising. It was kind of gobsmacking than would be, he said, the discovery of a space alien. So that just shows you how out of the blue this paleontological discovery was. Well, it is pretty crazy that this myth has gone on for so long all over the world, or all over that part of the world, I should say, like the Orang Pendek. Yeah. Right? That one's what? Is that Vietnam or is that? Orang Pendek is in mostly southern Sumatra. Sumatra. So very close to Malaysia. And it's a very similar description. Yeah, on the whole, I would say so. I've written a bit about that as well. with Floresiensis is that with Floresiensis, we have fossil evidence for something

15:08that could have survived until much more recently. Whereas in Sumatra, the fossil evidence for Orang Pendek is not there. And also, of course, on Sumatra, you have all kinds of primates that could be, shall we say, mistaken or taken for a very small human. Orangutans, for one thing. But Flores does not. Flores has only one species of monkey and no apes. And the monkey, a macaque, a long-tailed macaque, was introduced by humans thousands, just a few thousands of years ago. So no native apes, no native monkeys either. So these people, when you first went in the 1980s, how frequent were their sightings? And were they in a very specific area? Yeah. And what did they in a very specific area? Yeah.

16:08And what did they say the encounters were like? Well, the sightings have been entirely or nearly entirely in the Leo region towards the eastern end of the island, mostly in high altitudes, mountainous areas, mountain forest, and that's well away from human settlements for the most part. How frequently, it's difficult to say. I mean, I recorded over 30 reports of encounters, some of them not terribly credible. Others, you know, a dozen or so much more interesting. Can I ask you this? When you say not entirely credible, were there aspects of it that seemed like mythological? Like what was not entirely credible? Peter Robinson Not necessarily mythological, but it sounded like they could well have been identifying monkeys. And another, well, one reason for that was what they described.

17:37Another reason was that a lot of those less credible ones were in circumstances when you wouldn't expect a human to encounter anything like Florizensis. And largely close to the coast where most people live and have lived for a long time. Whereas, yeah, all indications are that the Laihoa, as they're called, the local hominoids are much higher up in unsettled parts of the mountains. So that would indicate that there's a food supply for them up there. Yeah. And are they primarily vegetarian? They seem to be very much so, yeah. I mean, the dentition on the type specimen, the skull, the teeth, suggests a vegetarian herbivore, if you will. The best specimen, the type specimen as it's called, doesn't really show any definite canines.

18:40Molas are fine. In great shape, by the way, for the age. But, yeah, so I would not say they didn't have pronounced canines as do chimpanzees, for example. Right. Even though chimpanzees are also largely vegetarian. Largely, but they apparently prefer to eat monkeys. Oh, yeah. No, that's – well, like humans. I mean humans during most of our history have of necessity eaten grains and vegetables and so on because they couldn't afford the meat. But nevertheless, meat has usually been a prized food. Yeah. Well, we're clearly omnivores, right? But if you were a creature that lived in this mountainous terrain, it's probably not a wide variety of mammals, right? And if they didn't really have weapons, they had very small stone tools.

19:49There seems to be no indication they have anything they could throw or anything along those lines. They could throw stones, throw rocks. Stones. They're pretty strong for their size. Good luck being successful at killing a deer throwing rocks. It'll take you a long time to get one. Deer are also a recent import. Oh, is it? In fact, flora is mammal poor. The only indigenous native mammals are bats, as you would expect, because they can fly freely to the island, and rodents. So what are the dragons eating? The dragons were... Because they're huge. Well, it's interesting because at one time they were eating the godons, certainly. You think they made them extinct, perhaps, because it's a small island?

20:37Well, they could have contributed to that, yeah, along with other factors. But besides dragons, there are other large rats. Oh, that's right. They have that one very aggressive tree rat, right? Now, that guy is still around, as I know. Oh, really? I've got photos of him. That thing's huge, right? It is a huge rat. A couple feet long? It's at least, I think, in terms of metrics. So, yeah. Oh, that's what it looks like? Oh, there it is. Look at the size of that sucker. Yeah, no, that's great. Mostly or largely tail as a lot of animals, but it is big, as you can see. That lady looks like she's got one as a pet. I'm not sure if that's the same creature I don't think it is Oh, okay But, yeah, now that looks more like it

21:33Yeah, yeah This episode is brought to you by the Farmer's Dog Which is exactly what I feed my own dogs And you know why? It's real food that can make a real difference In their long-term health and it's totally backed by science. Every meal is developed by board-certified nutritionists, made to human-grade safety standards, and is backed by published research that shows it supports healthy aging. And my dogs love it. I want my dogs to live as long as possible, and I want them to be healthy. So the fact that fresh food from the farmer's dog actually helps reduce the formation of harmful compounds associated with age-related decline is a huge win. Get 50% off your first box of the farmer's dog

22:18at thefarmersdog.com slash rogan. Plus, you can now add their human-grade crunchy biscuit treats to any plan. Try them today. Papagomis. But if you're a 10-foot-long poisonous lizard, it's going to be hard to sustain that mass just on rats unless they're overpopulated with rats. Well, I've got to say that once extinction dates for pygmy stegodon or any stegodon, well, I can't recall the current figures, but they're always changing. But as soon as you had humans on the island, you had pigs and dogs. And some of the pigs quite quickly, I think, became feral, which they were wild. Yes. So, and then, you know, deer at one point were introduced by humans. So certainly deer and pigs, and not to mention domesticates like goats.

23:26Even young buffalo and horses are prey to dragons at present. In a sense, it could be Homo sapiens that's kept that creature alive. So they could have wiped out the pygmy elephants, and then we could have probably maybe come in at a very opportune time with a bunch of domesticated animals, pigs, dogs, and then they started eating those. I should say also the little ape men that Leo, for example, described are also reputed occasionally to steal chickens, very small piglets. Yeah. So, yeah, not to deny that they wouldn't eat meat if they could get it. So when you went there, was it 84 was the first time you went? That was the first time, but, you know, I kept going back sometimes every year. But when you first went, did you go looking for this specific creature?

24:27No. No, I went because there are parts of Flores, including Nage country, right in the center where I first researched. It's okay. It moves around a little bit. You can stay where you're sitting. No, that's fine. No, the reason I went was to visit the people and find out how they lived and what they believed in. And because they were kind of blank on the cultural anthropological map. And it was just incidentally, you know, by accident, you might say. And were these people, what kind of life are they living? A subsistence lifestyle? Are they hunter-gatherers? Are they? Certainly in the 1980s, yeah. They were still largely subsistence cultivators, small farmers who would feed themselves from what they grew.

25:26Also hunters, however. The men very much value hunting, although not a lot of their food supply comes from that activity. And are they hunting animals that have been introduced, like the deer species and pigs? Deer and pigs are the two prized types, the most valued types of game. But they'll also kill monkeys, wild cats, feral cats. Feral house cats? Yeah. Well, that sounds like what they are. I don't think there's any indigenous. Yeah. But although some people in the past have thought they were, including Alfred Wallace, who you may know. Mm-hmm. Sure. But, yeah, but also things like, well, the giant tree rats that you mentioned. They hunt those. They hunt those. in one or two places, by the way, that it's rather unlikely that Florisiensis

26:27would have been able to hunt the tree rats because they're very difficult to hunt. They're vicious as hell. Really? Yeah. So you need, well, from what I'm told, what I am told often, was told often by the Nage, for example, is that you need more than one person. Dogs. You need dogs. You need dogs to hunt the rats? You need a kind of a prod to knock them out of the tree and so on. And it's often reported that people are injured from the teeth of these damn things dropping down from trees. Well, you saw how big it was. So, yeah. Well, that's a great meal, though, if you're a three-foot-tall human-like creature and you eat a two-foot rat. Yeah. That's a good catch. Yeah. Mind you, at the same time, let's talk about Florizensis, would possibly have been able to catch smaller rodents, nature rodents.

27:32Sure. So when you first went there, what was the first story that you heard about these little hairy people that lived in the woods? Yeah. The first story I heard in the Nage region that I've mentioned was a kind of local legend about how they were wiped out by the ancestors of the Nage. And it's a story that whatever the basis, in fact, I was clearly been embellished, embroidered. You get narrative themes entering, including two escaping, the extermination and this is an old plot line and moving to another territory where they sister and brother, as usually said, where they ancestrously managed to maintain their species. But yeah, that was the first story. I mean, according to that one, these were creatures called abugogo is a term you may have come across.

28:40They were in the habit, it said, of, they lived in a cave high on the mountain, but they were in the habit of coming down a bit lower downslope and joining in feasts and dancing of villagers. And they were given food by their reluctant hosts. But they did odd things, like, yeah, they would certainly eat the food, but then they'd start biting into the plates, which were made of, well, traditionally made of sort of pumpkin skin, dried pumpkin skin. So, yeah, you can break them with your teeth. I don't know if a human could eat them or want to. But then- So they were just confused as to where the food ended. Well, this is the idea. That particular category of creature, Abugogo, always interpreted as

29:39or represented as being stupid. Right. Yeah, very stupid. So they couldn't tell there didn't be food on a plate. They were made drunk. They were given copious amounts of palm wine, palm gin. And then, of course, eventually they wanted to go back to their cave to sleep it off. And what was the timeline for these supposed interactions? Well, as far as one can tell from local genealogies, family histories, that sort of thing. Yeah, we'd be talking at least 200, 300 years ago. So this was like folklore or at least like legend that they would tell the stories of these people. And so this was the first story that you heard of these creatures? That was the first one. Yeah, there are other stories told soon

30:27thereafter. This was the first one where you were explained that at least at one point in time, there was supposedly a small, hairy human-like creature that lived on the island. Yeah, that's exactly right. People are very insistent. The storytellers, very insistent that these things weren't like forest spirits or anything. They really were- It was an actual animal. It was an actual animal, exactly. And when did you talk to someone that had had an encounter? That was – first of all, that was when I visited the Leo region, which is the main topic of the book, as I said. Yeah, and that was in the early 2000, 2001, 2003. What was – so you had been – you'd had this in your mind for a couple of decades at that point.

31:26Yeah. So what was it like to hear that there was a possibility that these things were still on the island? And people haven't seen the island of Flores before. No. It's incredibly dense, mountainous. Very mountainous, yeah. Very difficult to get to. There's not like a real – like is there a road structure that allows you to get from one side of the island to the other? There's a Dutch colonial back in the... Is it a coastal road or does it just go through the middle? It goes wherever it can go because it's so mountainous. There's virtually no straight stretches. Right. So it kind of snakes all over the place. So a lot of it goes through the, yeah, a lot of it along the coast, but other parts in more central areas.

32:10Jay, can you see if we can get a photo? Well, I'm looking at the map. I'm just trying to find the road. Yeah. Well, it's insanely dense jungle. So this is what we're looking at is just a 3D topographical. Okay, yeah. I mean, we're looking at it from above. And this, if you get a photograph of what it looks like, because I've seen some drone photos of the island that are really spectacular because, you know, they're above the tree line and you go, okay, anything could be out there. It's just, it's like parts of the Amazon where you look at it and you go, well, this is just so dense. Certainly in higher elevations. Yeah, just incredibly dense. And people are not regularly traveling to this area, certainly not Westerners who are there exploring and doing anthropological work.

33:01There are a few tourists these days. Yeah, okay, so this is a good representation. It's just incredibly dense, mountainous, beautiful, but wildly, you know, not uncharted necessarily because we actually know where everything is, but people aren't going and making an audit of all the different animals that are there. So it is possible that something could ... If you looked at it, you're like, well, maybe. Well, yeah. There have been studies by zoologists of certain parts of the local wildlife, local animal life. But yeah, none explicitly in search of something like Floriziensis or the Leo ape men, as they call them. So when you first had someone explain to you an encounter, how far was that from the actual

34:04discovery of the bones? Because you had the conversations with people that were telling you that they had encountered one prior to them discovering these bones, correct? Yeah. Certainly prior. Not very long before, a couple of months. But certainly, yeah, well over a year before the Plurigensis discovery was announced in the media, including the scientific press. That must have been incredibly exciting to hear these stories and go, wow, I've been talking to people about these things for 20 years now. And now this guy tells me he saw one. And then a couple of months later they're finding bones you had to be like wow this is i was i was quite staggered yeah i actually i find it kind of hot in here can i take my jacket off yeah absolutely of course

34:56yeah take your jacket off so as we were saying yeah um you had this encounter with someone who explained they had seen one in the flesh and and then just a few months later, they find these bones. That had to be incredibly exciting because you had, especially in the early, when they were saying it might potentially only be 10,000 plus years old. Yeah. No, I felt extremely lucky. Right. And, I mean, if, you know, I'd first heard about these things a year or two later, I, well, I probably wouldn't have written the book, and I wouldn't have, you know, taken it much further. I would have thought, well, you know, there is a possibility, however slim, that somebody's seen a reconstruction of Floresiensis in a newspaper or on television.

35:54But no. Yeah. discovered is that the name Laihoa is in fact recorded in a Leo language dictionary, Leo German as a matter of fact, which was research for that went on in the 1920s and not long after the establishment of a Dutch colonial administration written by a German missionary. And it finally was published in 1933. And there were mentions of Lai Hoa. And some of the information, which came from sample sentences of the language, were consistent with what people generally were telling me about the Leo ape men. So that was another strong indication that the whole notion of these creatures hadn't come from the fossil discovery. Was there any encounters or descriptions from missionaries, from ancient missionaries that had visited?

37:08No, not that I've been able to discover. And I've looked for that kind of thing, obviously, but no. So they had only documented stories. Yeah, it's quite remarkable. The man I knew for quite a long time, a Dutchman in the Nage region, a missionary, a Catholic missionary who'd been there for ages. And he'd never heard of the Obugogo, which are the Nage ape men. And which, you know, stories about these, like the ones I just described, are pretty widely known in the region near the village where whose inhabitants were supposed to wipe them out hundreds of years ago. But the missionary never heard it. I was surprised, and I'm sure he was being honest. Now, when you first got the initial report from someone that had encountered one of these in real life,

38:14did you then start looking for other stories from other people to get more confirmation? I did, but not so much in that particular year. That was, as I said, summer 2003. And yeah, because I had to return to Canada, I think it was in the June, and I had to return in the July or early August, something like that. So I didn't have a lot of time in that year. But after hearing about Friziensis, of course, I did initiate a new project, which enabled, gave me funds to go back and, yeah, talk about a bunch of things, not just the hominoids, but certainly to pay much more attention to Leo, the Leo region, and to these creatures than I'd done previously. And how many reports of encounters had you had?

39:19Like how many different people? I interviewed, well, to answer your question, somewhere in the 30s, 32, I think. Peter Van Doren Wow. Peter Van Doren But I talked to more people than that, just about these hominoids in general, what they'd heard from their parents or from whoever, to get a good idea of the kind of local knowledge there was about them. And so in total, yeah, it was well over 120, 130 people I think I talked to in all. That it had encounters? No, no. No, 30 that had encounters. They knew something about, knew what a Lai Hoa was. But if you talked to 120 people and 30 of them had encounters, that seems like a lot. I guess it does, yeah. But then there were a lot of people besides who knew virtually nothing about a lihor.

40:16Oh, they didn't want to talk to me or they were scared or whatever. Right, right, right. Now, did they all have similar descriptions? Yeah. otherwise most credible sighting reports seem more accurate, more in line with the standard image of ape men than, you know, others. And even, as I said, even among the sighting reports, there were some that I was inclined to dismiss as being, you know, mistaken monkeys or, yeah. Right. So at least a few of them possibly could have been this actual creature. Yeah. If they're being honest. That's right. And it just takes one out of 30 odd or. Yeah. I mean, if you have that many and also you have bones and then also you have a history of these things, it's just what would be required to comb the forest would be involved? Camera traps, like various technologies

41:46that you could use to potentially find these things? Yeah, not so much forests, although forests included, but, you know, higher slopes of mountains, of which there are many in Leo territory and, you know and neighboring districts as well. You'd need people who are young and fit. And quite a few of them. Yeah, you'd need different sorts of expertise. I mean, certainly people who could handle the terrain. Maybe also people who, well, primatologists, shall we say, people specializing in the study of apes and monkeys. That would be helpful. Zoologists working in that area as well. You mentioned camera traps. That would be a good idea. In fact, I'm working, I think you could say, at present with a man in the Netherlands

43:00who is very keen on doing the sort of thing you've just described. And he has visited one area in particular, and there's a story about that, but I won't backtrack just yet. He has visited one volcano and placed traps, taken lots of photos and so on. He wasn't there for very long. He wants to go back, I think, late next year, but with a team. And he's asked me to investigate people with experience of, you know, rugged country and that kind of search. In fact, he even recommended I talk to you about it, but I don't know if we want to go about it. Well, not you, but maybe somebody in your team, somebody you could recommend. Some explorer type? Yeah. But in the meantime, quite recently, in fact, I've been asked for an interview by Les Stroud,

44:09who... Sure, Survivorman. You made it. Yeah, exactly. He's a big believer in Bigfoot. Well, yeah. But I... Yeah, so I'm expecting him on Friday the 13th, actually. So just in, what, nine, ten days' time. And I think he would be the kind of person to consult on that. Well, he could live up there for a few months by himself. Yeah, well, maybe I can get him interested. Yeah, he would figure out, like, that would be a great idea for a series. Because, you know, he's done quite a few episodes looking for Bigfoot to no avail. Shocking. Yeah. Never found it. But this would be, I think, probably more likely than finding Bigfoot. First of all, it's an island. Yeah. It's not just an entire coastline.

44:55Like if you're in the Pacific Northwest or wherever you're searching for Bigfoot. Yeah. And the other thing being that, you know, a guy like Les going solo because he does everything solo. He doesn't bring a big camera crew. It would be a smaller footprint. Probably less likely to make a lot of noise and disturb things. Yeah. That's a good feature. Yeah. And if he found something, boy, that would be exciting. That would be one of the most exciting things that's ever happened in all of anthropology. Yeah, yeah. No, indeed. And I think, you know, I'm not a firm believer in anything really, you might say. Good for you. But I was a bit skeptical. But the evidence in this case, the coincidence that we were talking about a minute ago

45:50between the discovery, the reconstruction of Floresiensis and what Leo people and others were describing to me, you know, the match is so remarkable that, you know, unless there's been some huge, well-hidden conspiracy designed entirely to fool little old me, I just can't imagine it. Well, you know, coincidences do happen, including remarkable ones. So maybe that's it. But even so, I think, yeah, it's worth further exploration. I mean, back in 2005, when I began to look at the LIHWA hominoids in earnest, I was already approaching 60 years. I've never been particularly athletic. And, you know, by the time I left, left off this piece of research back in 2018, yeah, I was already in my 70s. So, you know, and you've seen the country.

47:02I mean, there's no way I'm going to be scrambling up a mountainside. Dangerous, too. Yeah, I won't go into the particulars of my present physical condition. But, you know, it's a bit of a challenge going anywhere these days, I must confess. So, yeah, no, the research is worthwhile. Not, you know, guaranteeing success of any sort. Now, what about potential use of technology? Are they going to use drones or anything along those lines? Because they've gotten incredibly good. That's right. Yeah. Yeah. Well, yeah, no, this is on the sort of bucket list for this colleague of mine, a young guy, financially successful, who has, you know, the time to do this kind of thing. Yeah, I think drones are certainly on the list.

48:05So, yeah, those would come into play as well. Yeah. And so how much of the area where they find them, how much of a piece of land are we talking about? What is the square kilometers? The Leo region. Can I just grab a... Sure – I'm getting very dry here. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, there's water in there, that glass right there. I'll take a bit of this. And there's coffee in here if you'd like some coffee. Oh, that's great. How big is the area where – I mean, is it centrally located where they keep finding these same – the sightings? Is it all in the same particular area, or is it spread out? Yeah, well, I've worked mostly in a place called East Leo. But there's no clear indication of the bounds of knowledge of this kind of creature.

49:09So they go, yeah, to the east and to the west. They're just mostly avoiding people. Yeah, well, certainly the creatures are. But, you know, the fact is that different people, their knowledge of local wild animals is different from maybe their neighbors or people at on parts of the Mele Peninsula, close by as well, there is a kind of wild rabbit or hare, not the kind of place where you'd expect to find rabbits or hares perhaps, but this animal was unknown to most of the local people. It was discovered by Western, many Dutch, I think, naturalists, and given a scientific name and all that kind of stuff. Local people didn't have a local name for it. Interesting. Yeah, and in fact, it's now known mostly,

50:21and so far as people are aware of it, with the national Indonesian name, Kalinji, which refers to rabbits that were imported by the Dutch as food a couple of centuries ago. Is that, they think, the source of these particular wild rabbits on the island? No. No, this would be quite a separate species. Okay. They would be indigenous, yeah. Right. But again, local people or lots of local groups didn't know about them. Reasonable, they're forest dwelling and they're quite rare. Right. So no great surprise. surprise, but if I may, something that I was going to say with regard to my friend who plans to go back to Flores with an expanded search. He became very interested in this particular locality, particular mountain, in fact, because of reports I received

51:27out of the blue about three years ago from two British visitors hikers, outdoorsmen taking a break on Flores and doing scuba diving and hiking, a bit of mountain climbing, this kind of thing. They, I have to think about the details of this because it was, yeah, like three years back. They finally found their name, my name, I should say, after doing, one of them in particular, found my name after doing an internet search concerning apes and monkeys on Flores Island. And I came across my name in connection with a creature, a central Flores creature called Obugogo. And one of them, yeah, he wrote to me. He contacted me first of all across LinkedIn and asked me about monkeys on the island and I told him and he described to me

52:38what he and his friend, both of them at the same time, had seen on the higher slopes of this particular mountain. And he said, I think in his first communication, that it sounds like you're a bugogo. So naturally I followed this up and had some more conversations by phone and email with these two young men. And it was nothing they told me to kind of disabuse me of that possibility. Now, I should stress that I can't go into all the details or the circumstances of our communications. But all indications are that they'd never heard of my writings or never read my writings on Flores Ape Man. So they just had an encounter and sought out an expert? They had an encounter. Well, it's interesting because I managed to interview them subsequently

53:37separately, which was a good thing. And one of them, in fact, the main contact, described what he saw as something very much like a Leo ape man, you know, a little man, a little human, but, you know, monkey-like. Bipedal. Bipedal, yes. That was his impression. The other man described it as looking more like, you know, another sort of primate. In fact, he described it as a monkey, but a very big one, an unusually big one. And it's interesting because those two opinions, those two interpretations, very much align with the range of descriptions that I recorded from local people. You know, some descriptions had it more monkey-like, others more human-like, and, of course, naturally there were variations

54:33in the estimated size of what people see. What's the highest? The highest comes from a second-hand report of a Laihoa, and that would have been about 1.4 meters, which is bigger than... Four feet? It's getting four feet, yeah. Yeah. Yeah, you're right. So this encounter that these gentlemen had, this was only three years ago? Well, actually, the encounter was in 2019, in March. And, you know, they hadn't followed this. They hadn't thought about it. And then, for some reason, they met. This is it. I think they were separated for some time, these two guys. And they met and, you know, over a drink, started to reminisce about their visit to Flores. Now they'd like to go back. And one said to the other,

55:31God, do you remember that huge monkey we saw? And went on to discuss that. And then one of them, he took some time to kind of follow this up by looking for information on the Internet. And it was that way that he finally came across my name and contact details. So is that one of the only Westerners or at least groups of Westerners that spotted these things? This episode is brought to you by the movie Ghost Soldier. Jim Caviezel plays Fitz, a former American special forces soldier and advanced weapons developer. As a military veteran, Fitz has a strong code of justice and a natural instinct to protect a vulnerable community from a powerful corporation. Here's the trailer. Listen carefully. You made the mistake of thinking you're safe behind money and guns.

56:38But this land doesn't belong to you. I've been paid to end wars and dismantle regimes. I'm the man they send to erase problems. And tonight, you're the problem. Now that doesn't sound like a guy you want to mess with. Ghost Soldier is a fun action film that demands to be seen in theaters which opens nationwide on Veterans Day, November 11. Rated PG-13. There are two of them, of course. No, not quite. I might mention 2019 was well before the 22 book came out, so that's a factor as well. No, not the only two. There was a man, not Western but Asian. I won't give any more details of that because he didn't want me to mention this in the book. But he came across something in the dark, trekking back towards Upslope, a village he was staying in.

57:48He got a bit lost, actually, and managed to find his way. And he saw something which was described, certainly interpreted by local people as having been one of these ape men. And that would go back to, I guess, yeah, the last century, 1990s maybe. But he's a person I know quite well. But also, well, somebody who became a friend of mine, sadly passed away a few years ago, was working on the neighboring island. He was an anthropologist. He was working on the neighboring island called Sumbawa, which is immediately east of Flores, another big island, lots of mountains and so on. And he had a similar sighting back in the – similar experience, I should say, back in the 1980s and was very open about the whole thing and gave me detailed descriptions on more than one occasion.

59:01Now, that he did allow me to mention in the book, in fact, in more than one book. And did he describe the same type of creature, the same type of experience? A big monkey standing upright, no tail, about three feet or more tall. Yeah, there was more than one of them that he saw, the end of a kind of a grown-over area, sort of a tunnel that had been created by vegetation. He was trekking through jungle, and he came across these things. And he turned back. Actually, he wanted to find there was a site with certain stone monuments that he'd heard about and, you know, villagers down below had sort of pointed him in the right direction. He followed the trail they'd indicated. And he was still in his 20s at this time.

1:00:00He was in pretty good shape. And then he came to this area, which was grown over, grown over to the extent that he had to go on all fours to continue climbing. some light, of course, sunny day, where he saw several of these creatures, mostly kind of silhouettes, you know, given the lighting conditions. They made sounds which were unlike local monkeys. And there you have it. He wrote it up in his field notes, which he showed me. Much tidier than my field notes, I can tell you. What he'd written at that time, recorded with what he told me. Again, we talk about Florizensis. I mean, there's no reason that that species or something very much like it is not present or wasn't at one time present also on other islands around and about.

1:01:20And this – so his depiction of it was before you had ever had your first description of it given to you. Yeah. You can say that. We weren't qualification. My first research in Indonesia was done in the 1970s as a doctoral student. And you never heard any of these stories then? Well, I was working on the island of Sumba, which is not the same as Flores. It's a big island to the south. Not to be confused with Sumbawa, but this is just Sumba. And there, there is a tradition of... Well, something that sounds more like the Sasquatch, actually, or the Bigfoot. Because, yeah, these are sort of, you know, half human, half ape, standing on two legs. But they're much bigger than, well, than us. Certainly much bigger than local people.

1:02:27So they're talking about, you know, two to three meters in height. And I must say, the evidence for them is not as good as for, you know, my Flores ape men. So I'd heard about this. Also, I might mention that I did my first degree in Vancouver at Simon Fraser University, my undergraduate degree at Simon Fraser in the late 60s and into the 70s. And this was a time when there was a lot of interest locally in British Columbia, in Bigfoot. It was also at that time, yeah, late 60s, very late 60s, that there was the film supposedly made in Northern California. Oh, the Patterson-Gimlin footage? Patterson-Gimlin, exactly, yeah. Yeah, there's a new documentary out that kind of shows that that had been rehearsed.

1:03:20Oh, yeah, there's a lot of suspicion. Pre-fake. Although at the time it's interesting, I know there were a number of, or a few at any rate, primatologists and so on who thought it credible. But there's that film and then of course there's the phenomenon as a whole. But anyway, from that kind of thing going on in the late 60s, early 70s, I became interested. Well, I was studying anthropology at the time, including prehistory and paleoanthropology and a lot of talk about the possibility of this kind of thing. And yeah, so I was just studying human evolution and all the rest of it. And so I became aware at that point that there were reports of things still alive that kind of looked like, you know, homo erectus or some of these physically primitive forms of homo, of humans.

1:04:25Well, it's an incredibly fascinating idea. And we know from what we know about the fossil record, the fossil record's so incomplete because it's so difficult to make a fossil. So when we find new things like the Denisovans, which is a very recent discovery, we go, oh, well, there's a totally different branch. Yeah. And they were larger than people. This is really interesting. So we don't really know because it's so difficult to make a fossil. That's right. In fact, it's infinitesimally remote, a possibility of a species, just a whole species, not just an individual animal being, you know, surviving, being preserved, being fossilized. That's why it's so crazy to try to get an understanding or a map of the past with fossils.

1:05:21Well, it's always changing. Right. It's always changing. They find a new one, throws a monkey wrench into the whole thing, and you're like, oh, well, ho, look at this. Now we know there's this kind, and now we know Homo Juliensis, and Homo... There's a whole series of them, the Denisovans. Yeah. No, and if we don't kill ourselves off in the near future, it's likely there'll be more of these discoveries. No, they're made quite by chance. The likelihood of anybody finding these things is remote. So the sample of fossil hominins is certainly not representative. I mean, it's really needles in a haystack. It seems to be constantly expanding our understanding of how many there were. Yeah, well, because research continues.

1:06:12That's why. But even so, there are lots of places where people could look. And, yeah, we don't know. With any species that is declared extinct, we don't know exactly when it died out. We know the most recent date. Right. Well, that's what's really interesting. And we know the earliest date. When it came into being as well, we don't know. And when you find something that's 60,000 years old, like those bones that they found in the cave, the odds of those being the last ones that existed are very small. Yeah, that's way in the—oh, that's a question of yours I didn't answer. I think that way in the eastern... Sorry, the western end of Flores Island is the discovery site, whereas I'm working mostly towards the eastern end,

1:07:01central or east-central Flores, so quite a distance away. But no, and let's remember as well that the evidence suggests that what's called Homo floresiensis survived for at least 50,000 years, which is quite a stretch of time. Especially when we don't really know how they got there. We don't know how they got there. There is evidence for something much earlier, 700,000 years ago, that could possibly be ancestral to Florizienses. Now, in that space of time, the notion that they were restricted to one small neighborhood is just not credible. They must have been all over the map of Flores. What is the evidence of the one that's 100,000 plus? The 700,000 plus, see me? Oh, 700,000. Oh, sorry, the Floresiensis.

1:08:00There's a number of specimens in Liangbo Cave. The most recent were initially reckoned to be 12,000, 13,000. That date was pushed back in a kind of interesting way to 50,000 or 60,000. Trevor Burrus How was the pushback? Was it radiocarbon dating? Joe Tainter Various methods were applied. I can't recall the details, but yeah, I mean, the point is, Joe, that this 12,000, 13,000 date was found to be a big problem. Sure. And so a lot of energy was put into retesting the geological situation in the cave. So is the current dating a certainty? No, nothing's a certainty. Right. So is it possible that it's earlier or it's newer rather? I think it is simply because we only know one site, a site, you know, not much bigger,

1:09:03if any bigger than this building on an island of that size. So it's interesting, the follow-up research looking for ancestors to Homo floresiensis, which turned up the 700,000-year-old fossils, that was all focused on finding something older, not something more recent or younger. Is that Flores as well? On Flores also, but in the central part on a large plain. Well, that's even crazier, right? So how did they get there 700,000 years ago? Well, there is evidence in the form of possible stone tools, let's just say stone tools, that something was making those artifacts a million years ago. So how did they get there? What did whatever it was that was living a million years ago look like? It's reckoned that they ... Well, they wouldn't have had like sea craft.

1:10:14No land bridges, by the way, that anybody knows about, so they would have to come somehow by sea. Lower sea level though, correct? Particularly during the ice age. Lower sea levels, but not a ... Not enough to traverse. not a land bridge. I mean, the stagodons swam over. Whoa. From how far away? Not that far. From the east or the north. Maybe they rode the elephants. Well, actually, somebody suggested that, but not likely. Imagine you're in a boat and you see a bunch of weird-looking monkey people riding elephants. Yeah. Now you would check your diet. I'd definitely pull my iPhone out. Yeah. Take a video. Yeah. Or creatures like Floresiensis apparently to kind of sail over accidentally on great clumps of foliage.

1:11:17I'm looking for a term now. Okay, like driftwood, like some sort of a log or something. How many miles or kilometers? Or a great clump of earth that had been dug up by a tsunami and driven out to sea. There's evidence for this kind of thing happening. So, yeah, you would need, of course, more than one of them to get to Flores, and they'd have to be opposite sexes as well. But it's all possible, given the time scale involved. Yeah, that's the thing that they do when they talk about human populations. They find these islands that are problematic in age. When they get really, really long ago, before they thought people were sea traveling, they go, okay, how many had to get out here in order to develop a population?

1:12:01So there's a mathematical equation to that, right? Yeah, yeah, No, for sure. As there are estimates of how many members of a population you'd need for it to be able to survive, continue, breed, and so on. So if it's such a small island that it's not possible that they evolved there. Well, I mean, it suggests they did part of their evolution once on the island. Sure, but once on the island. But how did everything else get there? Like, how did the dragons get there? How did the rats get there? Like, what's the origin of all these various life forms? It's very diverse, right? Well, yeah. I mean, rats seem to be able to get it everywhere. Yeah. Except Alberta, by the way. We have mice, but no rats.

1:12:49You guys have no rats? We're trying to keep them out as well. You guys have wolves, though. We have wolves and all kinds of things. Grizzly bears. Yeah, black bears. Yeah, a lot of black bears. Yeah, no mountain lions. Moose. Moose, all various members of the deer family. Big deer, huge deer, elk. You guys have everything up there. It's gorgeous. Oh, various members of the deer family. Big deer. Huge deer. Elk. You guys have everything up there. It's gorgeous. So-called antelope as well. Yeah. It is a beautiful part of the world. Yeah. Oh, yeah. Of course, we've got the two national parks, which are full of protected wildlife. But, yeah. No, let me say about the dragons. Yes. The so-called dragons, Komodo monotaur.

1:13:25Right. Great swimmers. Really? I mean, now they say about the dragons. Yes. The so-called dragons, Komodo monotosh. Right. Great swimmers. Really? I mean, now they swim between islands regularly. Ugh. Yeah. That's terrifying. So they would have no problem getting there. Right. So they probably just went wherever they smelled food. Yeah. They probably smelled something dead over there and just took a hop into the water. So all these various animals, the elephants could swim, the dragons could swim, the rats could figure out a way to get there. Birds, obviously, could fly. Yeah, bats, lots of bats, they can fly. And the monkeys came on boats. No, the monkeys were introduced like a lot of other animals.

1:13:59I mean, there are only mammals there, you know, sizable mammals of various species of mice and rats. And then there's the giant rat. You've got, what, pigs. Right, we talked about all this. We talked about pigs, yeah. Well, all the things that are introduced by people. Yeah, a lot of them were introduced by people. What year was this where they started getting introduced by people? It varies, and it's controversial. I mean, there's like dogs, for example. There's some evidence that suggested that they haven't been there very long, several hundred to a thousand years, but it seems likely to me they've been there longer. Pigs, there is a book in which I've written about all this stuff, but I can't remember now the details. Anyway, yeah, you know, they're monkeys, porcupines.

1:14:51There are porcupines that were introduced from Western. And they're a game animal. Really? Yeah. Wow. Oh, for sure. Well, they're ultimately rodents like rats. If you're going to eat giant rats, a porcupine is certainly also on the menu. Interesting. Yeah. You've got to know how to cook them and butcher them probably. Yeah, and kill them without getting jammed. Again, you need dogs for that. Oh, poor dogs. Well, the dogs have to be clever if they're not going to get injured. I've seen pictures of dogs with porcupine quills all over their face. It's so sad. Yeah. Well, that can happen with tigers in India, of course. I've seen that as well. Look at this poor dog. Oh, this poor dude. Yeah. Well, it's interesting.

1:15:44You should be able to produce those straight away. Oy, oy, dude. Yeah. Well, it's interesting. You should be able to produce those straight away. Yeah. So the point is there's a lot of wildlife, and a lot of it came from somewhere else, including the monkeys. And we have no idea if these little hobbit people, we don't have any idea when they got there or how they got there. But it's not just there but isn't there some evidence or at least some stories of them from the philippines as well yeah there's a similar uh similar remains in uh there's remains on island yeah oh how long ago was this discovered it was discovered after therese ensis. Oh, so it's fairly recent. Yeah, Luzonensis. That's called Homo Luzonensis.

1:16:32And it's a separate branch? It's a different animal? It's a different species, yeah. Wow. But then there are, I'm not sure the present state of interpretation on this one, but in China as well, in a place called Red Deer Cave. There's evidence for small hominoids living, yeah, the same region as Homo erectus, which was much bigger there, a bigger hominin. Yeah, and then in Africa, you've got, again, since the discovery of a small species called Homo naladi. That goes back about 200,000 years. But that apparently is small. But they're an interesting one, right? Because they buried their dead. Yeah. Now, that's right. They had a. Yeah, no, that's right. They had a kind of an unusually elaborate, you know, for their circumstances, symbolic culture, evidently.

1:17:37Yes. Yeah, nothing like that for Florizenses. And evidence of stone tool use too, correct? Yeah, I believe so. Yeah. And so weren't there the ones that had a specific area in a cave where they would deposit their bodies? Yeah, yeah, that's right. Yeah. A fascinating story. Really interesting stuff. Because it makes you think, like, well, what else did they have? Like, how long ago? And they were tiny, right? Yeah. Well, so did the Theresean. So there's evidence that this particular type of creature existed all over the world, or at least in many parts of the world, I should say. Parts of Asia and Africa with Naladi, yeah. Of course, the whole of the New World, South and North America, there's no evidence there for any kind of human or primate except for South American monkeys.

1:18:34Do we know if South American monkeys were indigenous? They came from the old world originally. I can't remember exactly how. I mean, this was, I guess, at a time when world geography was a bit different. So they were introduced as well? Yeah, not by humans though, but they managed to get there. They're quite different in many respects from old world monkeys. The main difference, I guess, is the prehensile tail. They can actually use the tail as a kind of a hole, an extra limb, whereas no old world monkey can do that. Really? Yeah. The whole story of these creatures, to me, it is so captivating. I really can't get enough of it. And what I also thought was really interesting was that when they first found these bones of Homo floresiensis, there was a lot of dismissing

1:19:35of it. And a lot of people thought that it was maybe humans that had some genetic abnormality. That's right. Very good. Yeah. Yeah. No. Somebody's done your research. Oh, you've done your research. I'm obsessed. No. I'm obsessed with this. No, that's right. I'll tell you, paleoanthropologists themselves can be interesting characters. Yeah. They can be very contentious. They sort of fight among themselves. Yeah, for sure. There are a few other academics that are like that. Yeah. But the, yeah, no, you're right. There was a member of the Indonesian, well, no, he wasn't a member of the Indonesian team, but a very senior Indonesian prehistorian archaeologist who was resentful of the fact he wasn't on the team

1:20:25and he wasn't, the team and he wasn't consulted early. But anyway, he dismissed this as a new, Floriziensis as a new species. And he claimed that these, what they'd found, were one or more humans who were suffering from a brain condition called—well, there are a couple of different possibilities. One's called microcephaly, I think. Yeah. So very small cranium, small brain. But this is an abnormality, and people in this condition, you know, they don't, as individuals, they don't survive. Adamantly rejected the notion that these were a different species. Has been. There was also the problem that these things are, yeah, the Florigensis, of course, were small, small-bodied, which doesn't correlate with microcephaly, which just turns the head.

1:21:24Right. And yeah, no, I mean, I don't think there's many people who support this. There is another bone of contention there, so to speak, and that has to do with the classification of Homo floresiensis as Homo or not. And most paleoanthropologists still seem to support homo. But there are some, including a guy called Chris Stringer at the National History Museum in London, who I very much respect, mainly because what he says agrees with what I think. But no, he suggested that for his answers, it's something much, much more primitive physically and that it derives from something much older, a separate branch, going back to somewhere in the region of Australopithecine, so pre-homo. And, you know, a lot of stuff, a lot of features of the fossils,

1:22:37not least of all the brain size, which is about that of a chimpanzee, so pretty small body size and all the rest of it. The lack of evidence for, in the way of culture, all of these things suggest something that is a different kettle of fish altogether. And in fact, there was a senior member of the team that discovered and analyzed and interpreted the Theriziensis fossils, a guy called Peter Brown, an Australian anatomist, who proposed a different name for Homo theriziensis. He gave it a new genus. He put it into a new genus, which he named, he gave the suggested name Sundanthropus, which would mean something like man-like being from the Sunda region, which refers to those islands. And from the Sunda region, which refers to those islands. And this was rejected on...

1:23:53Yeah, I mean, that there were... You know, it was just arguable, this kind of stuff. But some of the reasons put forward were not particularly credible, I found. I mean, one suggestion was that, you know, this thing is so recent, bearing in mind that one specimen was reckoned to be only 12,000, 13,000 years old at the time. But this piece was too recent, so recent that it had to be Homo. This betrays a very kind of linear, progressive view of, not progressive in a political sense, but in a time sense, of human or hominin evolution. Really, I mean, it's ironic because, yeah, it was the discovery of Floresiensis that threw your monkey wrench into that whole picture of human evolution. I mean, it was evidence in favor of a view

1:24:57which had been around a little bit already by that time that you didn't have a single line of evolution, whereas something bigger and better, more developed and so on, replaced something more primitive in a single line of development. Rather, the suggestion was that the view now seems to be that the human tree, family tree, as it were, is bushy. So, you know, something like a Jewish menorah, you know, the thing with the candles. You've got these things coming up side by side and, you know, terminating at the same point. We have that in everything else. It happens in all other sorts of animals. The idea that we would be isolate. Well, we are as humans so used to thinking of ourselves as special, right?

1:25:56I mean, everything in our culture, quite recently by paleoanthropologists. adopt an idea, start saying that this is the fact, and then are very reluctant to change their position, especially if they've been teaching it, if they're professors, if they've written books. Look what the Clovis first thing, like the, I forget the gentleman's name, who found these stones that indicated that there was people in the Americas far earlier than that. Oh, yes. He was destroyed. I mean, they've ruined this guy's reputation. They viciously attacked him, and it turns out he was correct. Yes. No, this does happen. He wasn't just correct. He was correct by a long shot. Like, they found evidence of things that were 10,000 years or close to it, 22,000 years,

1:27:00the White Sands, New Mexico footprints. Yeah, that date keeps being pushed further and further. Going further and further back. Right. There's other weird evidence of, it looks like someone had broken apart mastodon bones or mammoth bones. That's over 100,000 years ago. Yeah. No, you're quite right. I want to say something in defense of science and scientists. Actually, I mean, they are conservative. You're right. And they probably should be. Exactly what I was about to say. Yeah. Yeah. So, you know, I mean, there's a lot of uncertainty, obviously, in this field of endeavor that you can't rule out anything as being correct, including the prevailing view, at least for the time being. And it does take a lot to change things.

1:27:57I think on the whole, quite rightly, I... Yeah, I mean, with regard to what I've written, Quite rightly. With regard to what I've written, I don't argue, I don't attempt to argue that Floriziensis or something deriving from Floriziensis is definitely still around. I'm not going to make a statement of conviction like that. All I'm trying to say, and my focus, of course, is on the people, the modern people of Flores Island and their experiences and how they think, what they say, and all that kind of stuff. So what I need to explain as an ethnologist, a cultural anthropologist, is the basis of some of their claims about things, about creatures, about beings. Right. Some of those beings, I'm sure, are supernatural.

1:29:06That is to say, they don't exist. I mean, I'm thinking of things like forest spirits, various varieties of forest spirits, which have their names and characteristics. But they are not like animals or modern humans because they can't be perceived. Certainly, they can't be seen. They're invisible. And people say this. So there is a difference between them on that ground alone and homoferrigiensis with what I am showing is that there is a possibility that when Leo people make these reports about their ape men, that their reports are accurately based on some actual experience that individuals, a few individuals at any rate have had. Yes. So when you're talking to these people, is there evidence of psychedelic drug use amongst

1:30:00these people? You know what I mean? For the like forest spirits and stuff like that. I thought you're going to ask me if there's any evidence of my use of such substances in the field. I'll ask you that off air. But when you hear people talking about forest spirits, you start thinking about people in the jungle that have psychedelic rituals, like the Amazon with ayahuasca. Yeah, well, for one thing, rarely are these things the forest spirits have seen. You get the odd – well, you get a category of people, healers in part. Shaman. Shamans is not a bad description, yeah, who claim an ability to see things that other people can't. But do they have a history of psychedelic drug use? Nothing? No.

1:30:51Because most cultures have some method of perturbing their consciousness. Yeah. Are they using fermented fruits and making any kind of alcohol? Oh, yeah, making alcohol for sure. Okay. Palm wine, palm gin, very powerful stuff. Right. Good drink. Right. Now, are they drunk when they're seeing these forest spirits? No evidence that they are or were. Right. But are these, so is that the only documented substance that these people are taking on this island? Is there any particular plants that have any sort of hallucinogenic properties? Well, certainly traditionally, not so much nowadays among the men. But until quite recently, they would regularly, habitually, excuse me, chew what's called beetle nut.

1:31:39No, it's not actually a nut. It's an areca nut. It's a palm nut. And beetle, which is either a leaf or a sort of pepper from a vine, together with slaked lime. And this is mildly narcotic. I mean, yeah, I consumed it regularly when I was on Sumba in the 1970s. What was that like? It was pleasant. It turned my teeth black, as it does with the local people. It's kind of like, I don't know, smoking too many cigars in a row. Okay, so it's like a strong stimulant. Yeah, I never became physically ill in the stomach, but it'd make you feel good, like a lot of other things. I wasn't hallucinating. And yeah, so there's that in addition to that. You said slick lime? What is that? Slake lime. Yeah. What is that exactly? It has to do with the way it's produced.

1:32:49I mean, it comes out as a— Here, Janie just pulled it up. It's calcium hydroxide powder or paste. Yeah, I was going to say it comes out as a kind of a white powder, like talcum powder. And you take a dab of that with your beetle pepper or leaf and your Eureka nut, chew it all up, it becomes red. I mean, the plant materials are green. It's the fourth most commonly used addictive substance in the world after alcohol, nicotine, and caffeine. Yeah. Isn't that wild? I can believe that. That's wild. Yeah. I don't think I became addictive, even though I had a red mouth a lot of the time. Did it mess up your teeth? It made them black. That's it? But you could brush them off? Oh, wow. Look at these people.

1:33:40Oh, that's nasty. I'll tell you this, so you may not believe it, but I mean, I rarely brushed my teeth for two years on Zumba. Wow. What was your breath like? it, but I mean, I rarely brush my teeth for two years on Sumba. Wow. What was your breath like? I was very intent. My, my, well, I was smoking as well. Oh, boy. You know, whatever. And I'm still alive at the age of nearly 80, so there you go. You were smoking cigarettes on the island by yourself? How'd you get them there? Oh, there were cigarettes for sale in the United States. Oh, they have them? Not very good ones, yeah. Okay. And they make their own as well. They grow their own tobacco. Okay. So there's nothing, my point was, there's nothing that causes hallucinations.

1:34:14That's part of their culture. I hope my insurance agent isn't listening to this. Sorry, what was the question? Are you still smoking? A small cigar maybe five or six times a week. Okay. Yeah, after lunch only. I get it. No more six times a week. Okay. Yeah. After lunch only. I get it. No more than one a day. Some days none. I haven't had one since Monday. No, I enjoy smoking cigars. I do as well. But that was my point. If there was something that would cause them to see things that maybe wouldn't be available to other people. Consciousness. No, not really. And there's no – I mean with some shamans, people called shamans in other parts of the world, you have them making deliberate efforts to dissociate, to alter their consciousness.

1:35:13Through ritual? Well, it can be through percussion, drumming. Chanting. Chanting, yeah. It can be through substances, as you've described. Rigorous sex, even. Rigorous? Yeah. But there's not, like, psychedelic mushrooms or anything that grows there? On flores, no. Right. Not that I'm aware of, no. I'm sure I'd have heard about them if there were. No. There are, of course, in other parts of the world. And used by shamans as well. Of course. Yeah. So that was just my point with this, because you were talking about how there's things that they saw that clearly seemed to be mythological or just fiction. The spirits, yeah. But then they also saw things that match up with these hobbit people. Yeah, I must say, I mean, the Leo people

1:36:09certainly have these religious figures, if you want to call them that. And I tended to dismiss their accounts, which were often a bit towards the fantastic ends of things. Did they have other fantastic accounts, not of primates, but of other things other than forest spirits that also existed that seemed to be something that was fiction? Seemed to be fiction, yeah. I mean, one case I go into, again, in the recent book, is a creature that we are told is very good at climbing trees. That's not fantastic, but it has multiple testicles. The females as well as the males. Females. They come in two sexes. And it grows an extra pair every year. Whoa. When it's reached a limit, which I think is a dozen, two times six,

1:37:18it will climb a tree, wail all night, and be dead by the morning, or drop dead in the following morning. Now, that sounds pretty fantastic, I think you could say. Yeah, especially testicles on the ladies. It turns out to be the palm civet, which is a well-known animal and with some interpretation as features that accord with all these exaggerated claims. Have you ever had that coffee that they make out of the civet dung? Yes, indeed. Kopi Luwak. Luwak. That's exactly the species, yeah. I've had that. Yeah. Very remarkably smooth coffee, but it's disconcerting to think that you're drinking coffee that came out of a civet's butt. I guess so. But I guess there's weirder things that people eat, I think.

1:38:11Certainly. Or consume. Yeah, no, the species name is hermaphroditus. Really? Which relates to certain glands both sexes possess, which can be mistaken for testicles. Oh, okay. So that's the origin of the myth. That's the origin of the idea. Interesting. I mean, I later discovered that this fantastic, well, I was pretty sure beforehand, but it later became clear that people put it away as one of those. And it was a palm civet. Right. So then you have to take into consideration what other things are they seeing that is either getting exaggerated or getting incorporated into the folklore. Like if they see just a particularly large monkey, and maybe at a distance, and maybe through thick brush, and then they

1:39:07decide, because monkeys will occasionally be bipedal for brief periods of time. Chimpanzees as well. And apes, of course. Yes. Our closest relative. Yes. So it gets to the point where you go, okay, if you have, you know, 30 people that have these stories that seem credible, at least a few of those have to be BS, but it gets to the point where if you have enough of them and they're so similar, and then you have bones, and then you don't just have bones there, but you have bones in the Philippines, you have bones in China, and in Africa, you start going, hey, maybe this is a real thing. And the real problem is what's the ethical considerations if they captured one? Like if they capture a monkey, you could put the monkey in the zoo.

1:39:59Yeah. It gets real squirrely if they captured one of these things and then they have to decide what to do with it because like what is that it's not quite a monkey and it's not quite a person yeah no it's it's well between ape and human yeah using human in the sense of i would feel very bad if one of those was in the zoo i feel bad when i see monkeys in a zoo uh well especially chimpanzeeses, the higher apes. They look like they're in hell. Yeah. Yeah. No, I agree with you. I'm very torn myself on this point. I mean, obviously, you know, I'd partly like something like that to be discovered. I mean, it would— From a scientific perspective, it would be incredible. From a scientific—incredible, it would also kind of vindicate me, I guess you might say.

1:40:53But on the other hand, I think it would be much better if they still exist to leave them alone. Right, but you would have to prove it. And how would you prove that they exist? And especially in this day and age with AI video, it's almost impossible at this point to discern what's real and what's not. Very right. Yeah. But if they captured one of them, like, boy, I would feel bad. Like especially if it started making noises that sounded like a language, you know? Oh, well, then it would be kind of easier, I guess, to – yeah, you definitely wouldn't put them in a zoo. Right. Well, not only that. What are you going to do even in terms of studying them? Like do you decide to dart them for a short period of time and sedate them?

1:41:38And also there's complications to that. To sedate – who knows what they're allergic to. You could potentially kill them accidentally while studying them. I mean that's an issue as well. Right. I would say the best way to study them would be through field research, primatological field research. Yeah. A la, what's her name, Jane Goodall. Yes, yes, yes. And various other ladies, including the one that lived with mountain gorillas. And yeah, long enough so they become habituated to you and so on. Yeah, probably would be better if a slightly built female took on that role. Something non-threatening that would allow them to come into their community. Yeah, but they're not chimpanzees, or they weren't.

1:42:40So, I don't know. Gosh, it really, I mean, we are used to dealing with all these conceptual boundaries, right? Like human and animal and so on. And this would – yeah, this would present a real philosophical problem, a real conundrum. Yeah. telling me about a contemporary account of a woman who was an anthropologist who was, I just cannot remember where the village was, but this person had encountered something. I got it. Yeah, here it is. I've got it. It's a woman named Sabine Kugler, who wrote this book called Child of the Jungle. Her parents were German missionaries and a super remote area of Western Papau. So it was in New Guinea. He did an interview with her and she said that she had seen these little people and then she woke up in camp more than one time and they were looming over her and

1:43:50around camp. And she's a very sane academic, he's saying, not like a jungle person who believes in third world superstitions, he says. And this woman who is a very sane literary author, cutting edge scientist, and she swears that she saw these little people and she told the exact story. And so he says he actually has a recorded Zoom call that he could send me of this encounter. But this is a woman who was just like completely stunned encountering these tiny little people in New Guinea. So are there accounts in New Guinea that are similar? If I may ask, she was quite young at the time? I don't know. I mean, it's just something that Forrest sent me. He's a wildlife biologist. Right. And he does a lot of work trying to find extinct species as well.

1:44:44He's looked for the thylacine multiple times. Thylacine? Yeah. The thylacine? Yeah. Oh yeah. Interesting case that one. Right. So we have video of the last supposed thylacine that was alive in a zoo. Yeah, 1936. But there's quite a few credible reports of sightings. Yeah, there are sightings and if people aren't actually seeing them, there's that bigger, more fascinating problem of what they are seeing or where this all comes from. This is Forrest's history. This is what he does. He has a great YouTube channel, by the way. Yeah. And he documents his journeys. I think I've heard of the name. Really great. Great guy. If you might follow that up. Fascinating guy. But the point is like this woman told him the story.

1:45:32Yeah. Like this story is like insane. Yeah. She actually encountered these. So is there a history of them in New Guinea as well? I might just point out, not to appear too defensive, but I myself have been told similar stories by Flores Islanders. And I don't want to – I want to make clear that, you know, to my mind, that there's not as much difference as you would think between Flores Islanders and Westerners who report similar experiences. But you said New Guinea, Papua New Guinea, I think? Yes. Yeah. There are, again, in the highlands of that very big island, there are what are or used to be called human pygmies, populations who yeah there have been reports of those people showing up in sort of

1:46:36odd places and walking through human settlements as well you know also from reported by credible witnesses. I'm writing a book on witches. Are you really? Yeah, no, that's another thing. In fact, I had some difficulty preparing for this interview because I'm working on the proofs, the final proofs and the index. And I did pieces recently on Halloween. Oh, wow. That was just a Freudian slip. Oh, no worries. Witnesses, I meant. So what are the descriptions? Are they human, like careless? They are human. So they're just like tiny pygmies? You know, it's interesting. They don't wear a lot of clothes, as a lot of people in New Guinea who don't or didn't. So whether bodily hair shows up more than it might do otherwise, can't recall those details, but

1:47:34they are small and they are dark, like most New Guineans. And yeah, well, to be classified as pigmoid, they have to be, the average male height has to be less than 1.5 meters, which is like, you know, less than 5 feet or 4 foot 11, that kind of – So very small. Like African pygmies. But these are people. These are modern humans. This is very different. They're extraordinarily different. Yeah. Yeah. Not to confuse with than- They're extraordinarily different. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Not to confuse with Floriziensis or anything like that. So that may be what this woman encountered. So that might be that they lived- Very possible. We'd need more details of what she remembers seeing. Are these documented populations?

1:48:22Yes. So this is something that we know exists currently? Oh, for sure. Okay. So this is something that we know exists currently? Oh, for sure. I mean, there are detailed ethnographic, cultural, anthropological details of their socioeconomic systems and everything else. This is a totally different kind of thing. Yeah, of course. They speak languages like the rest of us. Okay. So as far as little tiny hairy creatures, you said Sumatra, the Philippines, Indonesia. Where else? Where else are these credible witness accounts of people experiencing these kind of little, tiny, my first inclination is to say, well, you know, Flores and I guess Sumbawa, a neighboring island, and Sumatra as well, the Orang Pendek. There are reports from North America by native North Americans of something that sounds familiar,

1:49:38similar. Nothing terribly detailed, but I know I did some research for another book years back on the Bigfoot or Sasquatch in the Pacific Northwest. And I think the Bella Coola Indians, the Bella Bella Indians in British Columbia, coastal British Columbia, had a category of the name of creatures which sounded like small, somewhat hairy folk. The Lai Hoa, of course, in Flores, there are various reports of how much bodily hair they have. And according to some, they're not terribly hairy, not like a, you know, a gorilla or a bear. So that's another kind of variable. But then, you know, if you just have the description hairy, then, you know, if you don't take that any further and, you know, investigate more,

1:50:47you don't know what that means. Hairy can mean, well, like the lady in the picture up there. It can refer specifically to mainly to the head hair. But anyway, yeah, there are, well, there's one report. I was talking about Sasquatch, which I find fascinating. From 1884, it even appeared in an early newspaper in that neck of the woods about a creature that was given the name Jacko. And I can send references to that if you're interested. but that sounded fairly genuine. Say it again. What is the name of it? The creature? What is it called? It was called Jacko. It's just kind of a nickname, which is sometimes a nickname for that he wound up killing. Do you know that story? Probably. I know it's Daniel Boone or David Crockett was supposed to have killed a bear when he was only three.

1:52:04I don't know which one it is. But Daniel Boone. This was a song on the radio when I was about five years old. He had an encounter supposedly that he documented with him and his son where they had shot and killed a giant human-like creature. And it was, I believe it was over eight feet tall or nine feet tall. Some enormous thing that had a different anatomy than humans. Like instead of having a rib cage, it had like a large plate of bone over its chest area. I mean, apparently, I sent this to my friend Steve Rinella and he said, Boone also had some tall tales. So I don't know. I don't know how much of this is true or not true. But the whole Sasquatch thing has always fascinated me because of the amount of different names that Native Americans had for this particular creature.

1:52:56And they didn't have a lot of fake creatures. It's, you know, they didn't have descriptions of things that just didn't exist. And they had a lot of names for a wild man that lives in the woods that's very tall and hairy. Yeah. No, you're right. In fact, there was a rather interesting paper written on that very issue by a guy. He used to be at the University of Washington. Meldrum? His name, not Meldrum, no. His name, he's long gone now. His name was Wayne Suttles. You'd be interested in the article, just looking at the different names and their derivations and all that kind of thing. No, Meldrum, another person who's passed. Yeah. No, I sort of was acquainted with him for a while. He was a true believer. Yeah, but at the same time, he was, you know,

1:53:49his arguments, whatever the basis, are pretty solid. He was a serious physical anthropologist. Well, you know who really believed in it, at least at one point she did, was Jane Goodall. Yes. So I understand. Again, I don't know much of the details of that. She gave interviews where she was saying that she's certain it exists. Yeah. You know, I mean, this was quite a long time ago, you know. Yeah. Who knows? I don't know. She's gone now. Yeah. But before she died, I don't know if she changed her opinion or she's probably tired of talking about it because that might have been the only thing people wanted to talk about. Yeah. Tell me more about Bigfoot. Yeah. Yeah. No, I mean, there's a number of other primatologists and people who study primates in the field

1:54:33who have also subscribed to, if not Bigfoot, then the Yeti, a guy called Vern Reynolds, who was at Oxford at one time, I think, and a guy called John Napier, who wrote a very interesting book called, I guess, Bigfoot, back in, I don't know, the early 70s. It largely, partly focused on the Patterson film. Yeah. Yeah. So, you know, I mean, it's not the case that all scientists, to use that broad category, you know, dismiss immediately. And in fact, I know paleoanthropologists, biologists as well who find my arguments credible. But it's very interesting. You know, they'll never say so in print. No, because – and again, you know, I talk about conservatism and so on. Somewhat understandably, they like to keep this in a separate kind of compartment.

1:55:49Completely understandably, especially if you're an academic. If you start saying you believe in Bigfoot, you're immediately put into the kook category. Well, there's that. But more practically speaking, I guess your funding will quite rapidly dry up. Yeah, there's a fine line between eccentric and foolish. Yeah. Yeah. Well, however eccentric I might be, I'm pleased to report that I never had, as a cultural anthropologist, particularly, you know, studying other people's experiences, beliefs, values, all this kind of thing. I never had that problem from my colleagues. I may have been more ignored than I would have been otherwise. But I've never had to put up with what – What's fascinating? What Meldrum did.

1:56:35Well, Meldrum was like a full believer. I asked him if he could chop one of your fingers off to find out if Bigfoot was real, would you do it? He said yes. I was like, oh, my god, man. Yeah. God, man. But the point is it's like as a cultural anthropologist, it is absolutely, at least the mythology of these things, is absolutely a part of culture. And a fascinating aspect of it because there's so many stories and they're so uniform. It's all like eight foot plus, nine foot tall, enormous, hairy, ape-like creature that seems to be very human in a lot of ways. It doesn't have the arm length and leg length of an ape. It seems to be built more like a large, hairy person. Yeah. Well, I would agree with you, except for one particular.

1:57:22These details, well, I'm talking about Flores, these details don't show up so much in what we call mythology or myths or even legends to make that distinction. The naturalistic descriptions come from, well, mostly from supposed eyewitness encounters. Right. If you look at general knowledge, then you do start to get kind of fantastic features, right? And also second-hand accounts. They pass them hand-to-hand. They, you know, kind of tend more in the supernatural direction, which in itself is fascinating. It's a kind of evidence for, you know, the eyewitnesses, especially having had an actual experience and referring to an actual creature. And, of course, that's where the similarities between the different accounts become remarkable.

1:58:33And not just that, of course, but the match with the reconstructions of fossils of Homo floresiensis. Yes. Yeah, but they had found that. If they had found that in North America, like if they had found a Bigfoot evidence, it would change the whole conversation. Then the conversation would be, is this an extinct? Like, imagine if they had found some Bigfoot jawbone in a cave somewhere that was an unknown primate that is 8000 plus years old. Yeah. Then you'd have to go, okay, now what are we talking about? Are we talking about something that's extinct or are we talking about a very small population of intelligent creatures that has thus far evaded being captured on film? Yeah, no, I mean that would – I mean it would get a lot more publicity than Florisiensis.

1:59:28Oh, my goodness. Happening in the modern West and in the U.S. or even Canada. It would have the same coverage. Well, the problem is unlike Homo Floresiensis or Floresiensis, there is so many hoaxes in America. There are so many guys like, I found Bigfoot. He's in my freezer. And like a big frozen doll. There's like so many kooks that have said and so many people have is the different cultural context, circumstances of, on the one hand, people in Flores, ordinary, you know, villagers reporting what, you know, they once saw, the culture, the circumstances, all that kind of stuff on the one hand, and the culture, the socioeconomic system in which people who claim to have observed Bigfoot live, different kinds of interests.

2:00:50I mean, nobody on Flores thinks they're going to become famous by telling me what they've seen, whatever it may have been. Right. Whereas with Bigfoot in North America, then, you know, you can become rich and famous. I don't know about rich. Maybe not rich but famous. You might be able to parlay it. I mean, look, you could get on Finding Bigfoot. I mean, how many seasons did they do of Finding Bigfoot? They never found Bigfoot. Never did. Spoiler alert. No. You watch a lot of hours-long television waiting for them to find it, and they never find it. Well, that's an excellent point because, you know, there's never been such a search on Flores. Right. And no local interest in such a thing either.

2:01:35That's probably pure. It's probably better that they don't do it that way. I think but a real true scientific search, not a reality show search, would be absolutely fascinating. Yeah. Maybe Forrest would be interested in doing it. He's fascinated by the subject. Worth doing as well. Certainly worth doing. Now when you were doing this whole investigation of Bigfoot, did you find any evidence or anything, any stories, anything that you thought was compelling? Well, I mentioned the 1884 report that was actually published in one of the few newspapers in British Columbia. This is a wild frontier, right? In fact, this thing that was seen was actually... Yeah, no, it was reputedly captured alive. That's right.

2:02:27But it was when the Canadian Pacific Railway was going through. And this was about a hundred odd miles from the coast in a very place called Yale, as a matter of fact. Near a place called Yale. It was small. One reason why I mentioned it wasn't a giant. I know that subsequent commentators have suggested it was an infant Bigfoot. How small was it? I think it was maybe four foot two. So it's similar in size to Homo floresiensis? A bit bigger. A little bigger. But certainly small for a modern human or for a Neanderthal for that matter. But there are North American or Native American tribes that have stories of small hairy people that live in the woods as well. There are. Well, just the one at any rate that I mentioned earlier.

2:03:23So, yeah, obviously by comparison with the Indonesian stuff. What did they wind up doing with this? Because photography existed at the time, right? It did, but I'm not sure how many cameras were available. And so no pictures were taken. Jamie's got it here. It's a story of a potential... Oh, four foot seven. I was wrong. Okay. Anyway, shorter than that. So a young ape-like creature of Sasquatch allegedly captured alive near Yale, British Columbia. Canadian Pacific Railway crew. First published in the Daily British Colonist newspaper on July 4th, 1884. The story is widely considered by modern historians and cryptozoologists to be a work of historical journalistic fiction. A newspaper hoax, which is very possible, too, because they did a lot of those back then.

2:04:16Huh. Yeah. Maybe. Who knows? So there's that. But is there anything else that you thought was interesting? Yeah, certainly there were some writers on Bigfoot like John Green, who's a newspaper man. In fact, in the Fraser Valley there, he was not quite so dismissive. The main reason I think the cryptos would dismiss Jacko is because he wasn't big enough for a Bigfoot. Well, also because newspapers would routinely make up stories. They would, yeah. But, you know, the eyewitnesses were all named, including one of the top bosses of the CP Railway. So I'm not sure if he'd want to stick his neck out so far or indeed why he would want to do it. Whatever became of it is a mystery. It sort of disappeared.

2:05:21I know there's a book published a couple of decades back by a guy whose name escapes me. He's a physical anthropologist. And the book is called Bigfoot Debunked. I mean, he's sort of virulently opposed to any suggestion that anything like this could exist. And the best he could do with Jacko is conclude that it was a chimpanzee that had escaped from a circus or a zoo. A four foot seven chimpanzee? Well, there you are. Now, I think it had longish head hair as well. But anyway. Really? Yeah. Now, I think it had longish head hair as well. But anyway- Really? Yeah. But it was by all indications naked, although this was not mentioned in the report. Kind of interesting. Bearing in mind this was the height of the Victorian era, you know, where you didn't

2:06:23mention such a thing. But yeah, no, the best this author, recent author could do is say that it was an escaped chimpanzee. Now, I mean, one thing one can be pretty certain of, very certain of, is that there were no circuses or zoos in that area at the time. I don't think there was a zoo anywhere in British Columbia. I may be... Very remote. Maybe. Well, yeah, it was a brand new... It was a colony at that time. Yeah. It wasn't part of... Well, I guess it had just become... Had it? And that area, British Columbia in particular, has a lot of those Sasquatch sightings. Well, this is kind of the classic domain of these things. Yeah. Yeah. I've got to say, no circuses either. No, no circuses. So do you think that there's a possibility that something like that,

2:07:17at least at one point in time, existed in North America? I don't want to rule it out. But as I say, the Flores ape men are much more credible because of the fossil evidence and the whole kind of ecosystem and the region of the world where they are, the existence of other primates, if not on the island, then pretty close by, the whole evolutionary history of that region. And again, not only are there fossils, but there's a close match between what the fossils indicate and what, you know, my colleagues in the field, Leo Villages, indicate. So, yeah, you've got to keep a bit of an open mind, don't you? Yes. Well, it's also my problem with Bigfoot is that it's fun. It's fun to believe. Yes. Well, it's also my problem with Bigfoot is that it's fun. It's fun to believe.

2:08:09Yeah. And so I start looking at my own judgment and going, stop. Yeah. Being silly, wasting time. Yeah. No, I don't find Bigfoot credible. And again, I've said so in print in an earlier book. It's interesting that 1884, I mean, that was a time when great apes, gorillas and chimpanzees were becoming widely known to a Western public. Right. Whereas they hadn't been before. But the discovery of mountain apes by Westerners wasn't until the late 19th century, right? The mountain gorilla, I think, was the 20th century, was it? Yeah. And the other, the Lerlin gorilla as well, was relatively recent. Yeah, they were thought to be a myth, which is quite hard for us to imagine today. Well, yes and no. I mean, if you look at their

2:09:09culture history and so on, the historical setting and all the rest of it. Don't forget Darwin, his ideas only became current in 1859. But I was going to say with regard to general knowledge about apes, these were something new. And they reached people through, I guess, the popular press, such as it was mainly at the time. Some people would have read books about them, but they would have been probably a minority. So people had only a vague kind of idea of what they looked like. Anybody seeing, I don't know, a very shaggy dog or maybe a small bear in British Columbia at that time might have made a mistake or, you know. That's a part of the problem. It created it, yeah. Bears also sometimes walk bipedally.

2:10:18Yeah. If you see them in the distance. Yeah. If it's dusk. Yeah. If it's very dense woods. Yeah. It's very difficult to discern what you're actually looking at. And then the mind plays tricks on you and you start. Indeed. I did a show with my friend Duncan where we went up into the Pacific Northwest to go looking for Bigfoot. And we were hanging out with Bigfoot hunters. And most of them just seemed like guys that are looking for a hobby. But there's one woman that I talked to, one woman who had an encounter and I don't know what she saw, obviously, but she was very, at least the way she was communicating, felt very rational, very sane. She was a smart person. She wasn't stupid. And she knew the area. She lived in the

2:11:02area. And she said she saw this thing and she, for a half a second she goes, that's a gorilla. Like why is there a gorilla in the forest? And she said she only saw it for less than a minute. It was moving through the trees. But she said – she goes, I know what a bear looks like. She goes, I know. She goes, it did not look like a bear. I think it was a Sasquatch and I think they're real. Yeah. The problem also with the Pacific Northwest and that particular area we're talking about, like Mount Rainier, it's so dense that the trees, the way I describe it, it's like a box of Q-tips. You know, it's insanely dense. You can't see anything. No. And it's the forest floor is filled with pine needles and leaves that have like landed and compacted over and over and over.

2:11:48So you're not going to get any footprints. No. No, indeed. And these things can walk quietly because the ground is very soft and everything's wet because it's just this tremendous rainforest. It's incredibly rich with life. And you're there and you go, okay, I could see how something could hide in here. Like you're not going to find things. Like you could only, like even if you had a team of people, first of all, you'd be making so much noise. It would smell you a mile away. I say smell would be a factor as well. Yeah. Smell you a mile away. Yeah. And it's so dense. Like the kind of forest up there is so incredibly dense that seeing something in the distance would be virtually impossible if you're actually in the woods.

2:12:30Yeah. Yeah. But the question is like if it's something that – look at that guy. Have you seen this guy before? Oh, yes, indeed. In fact – Jojo the dog-faced boy. Some of those pictures are in an earlier book I wrote. Yeah, there's people that have that condition today. Yeah, hypertrichosis. I stumbled across this guy from this. This is Julia Pastrana. She was around from 1860 and died in 1865 in Moscow, but is from Sinaloa, Mexico. Yeah. And was studied left and right by all sorts of people. They called her all sorts of things. So she was from Mexico. Look at her features. That's crazy. The hair all over her face. Yeah. That's wild. She was small, was from Mexico. Look at her features. That's crazy. The hair all over her face.

2:13:09That's wild. Small. Was a performer. Whoa. Her body is still being displayed somewhere. But as I'm hearing all these descriptions, I'm like, this would pass for that description you're saying kind of in some way or another. Sure, if you saw that, if she was tiny and she was running through the woods. A Bigfoot, you mean, yeah. Or, you know, any sort of forest person in some of these other places. I guess, but then you have to ask why would anybody like that want to be running through the woods, you know, in some remote place, presumably naked, you know, how some remote place, presumably naked. You know, how would they get there? How would they get home after all this? She was supposedly sold by her uncle after her mother died.

2:13:55Yeah, I know there's some unfortunate stories attached to these. Well, didn't they put a man in the Bronx Zoo? There was a man that they put in the Bronx Zoo who was, I think he was a pygmy. And they literally had him in the zoo for observation so people could see him. The Bronx, it's not impossible. I know there were. Same time period. Yeah. There were pygmies, pygmy families who were exhibited at, was it a World's Fair in, where the heck was that, Chicago? St. Louis, somewhere in the United States. Yeah. It was the same one. St. Louis World's Fair. Yeah, same guy. Oh, yes, booties. Yeah, this is one group of so-called pygmies. Let me tell you about pygmies. One hesitates a bit because the name is no longer politically correct.

2:14:53But we're talking about fully modern humans. Their brains and heads are not as small as their bodies. Okay, so their brain size would be comparable to anybody else. Interesting. So quite different from something like Homo floresiensis. But the point I wanted to make was that before a guy called Schweinfurth, a German explorer, was able to document the actual existence of African pygmies around the middle of the 19th century. I think it was 1847, so exactly 100 years before I was born. He actually bought one, if you can believe that. I'm as horrible as that sounds. But some pygmies were kept as slaves by taller Africans at that time. But before that, Europeans thought that pygmies were a myth,

2:15:58that there was no such thing, that this was a product of Greek mythology, especially, of course, it's from there that the name pygmy comes. So, yeah, comparable to our knowledge of or anybody's knowledge of gorillas, for example. Although pygmies were discovered a bit before. It's fascinating when you think of like how little people knew about the natural world just a couple of hundred years ago. Yeah. Well, no, indeed, that's a good point. I want to just correct myself. I said before, gorilla were discovered. They were well-known to local people in Africa. Of course. Right. Discovered by the Western world. With a very ethnocentric approach, which, which again is a matter of habit, right? Yep.

2:16:48I didn't mean to say that. And likewise with conservative scientists, you get into modes of thought that are not easy to alter. Yeah. Well, listen, I really enjoyed talking to you. And I'd love to talk to you about witches when that book is done too. That's another very fascinating subject. April Fool's Day, 1st of April is when there's an official publication date that you can order copies now. What is it called? It's called The Wicked Witch, and then there's a subtitle, which is Origins of an Enduring belief. Because one of my main aims is to show that there are very few cultures anywhere that don't have a belief that corresponds very closely, even in the smallest particulars, to what we understand by witches in the West.

2:17:44And I would immediately point out that I don't believe in witches. Whatever I might think about Homo Floriziensis or present-day descendants that might exist, no, witchcraft exists in accusations. People have accused, still accused as a matter of fact in many places, including in the West, other people of being able to, of being evil, of being able to harm other people maliciously, wantonly through supernatural means. So that's, but there's a lot of other things I've discovered about witches in that journey, which actually began a very long time ago when I first started to teach anthropology. But I think it's something that would be of interest to your listeners. A hundred percent. Yeah. So let's plan on doing that again.

2:18:35We'll do that. We'll do another podcast sometime after the book is out. Yeah. Okay. And we'll talk about that. Okay. All right. Next time, make sure you get me a flight to Austin that gives me more connection time from Houston because I missed my flight yesterday. Oh, did you? Yeah. Oh, sorry. Yeah. Okay. We'll do that. Thank you very much. I missed my flight. Oh, did you? Oh, sorry. Okay, we'll do that. Thank you very much. I really appreciate it. It was a really fun conversation. It's been extremely enjoyable and I'm very impressed by your questions. Oh, thank you. I'm very impressed by your work. Thank you. Perfect. Alright, bye everybody. Your sausage McMuffin with egg didn't change. Your receipt did.

2:19:29The sausage McMuffin with egg extra value meal includes a hash brown and a small coffee for just $5. Only at McDonald's for a limited time. Price and participation may vary. Promotion pricing may be lower than meal pricing. Hi, I'm Lexi, your friend and jeweler at Shane Company. If you're planning to propose this holiday, we're ready to make creating your engagement ring a warm, welcoming experience. At Shane Company, we're all about your style, your budget, your dream engagement ring. Explore the widest selection of diamonds and ring settings ready for you to see in person, or visit us at shaneco.com. You'll have your ring in days, not weeks. Our friendly jewelry consultants don't work on commission. There's never any pressure, just perfect proposals.

2:20:03Shane Company, your friend in jeweler.