podcasts / Hidden Brain / episode / question
Question

Why does Tania Lombrozo call conspiracy theories an error of over-explaining?

Answered from The Story of Stories · Hidden Brain · 2026-10-26

Tania Lombrozo, offering what she calls a somewhat speculative idea, says conspiracy theories take many observations that have separate or chance causes and tie them all to one group with one intention. That makes them simple at the root yet very complicated in the details. Shankar Vedantam used the 9/11 conspiracy theories as the example, arguing that hundreds or thousands of officials could not keep such a secret.

Source: our own transcription of the episode. The full conversation is on Hidden Brain (2026-10-26). Read the whole episode summary →

▸More from this episode

Q1What is the illusion of explanatory depth, according to Tania Lombrozo on Hidden Brain?Q3How do stories shape jury verdicts, according to Tania Lombrozo?Q4How does Tania Lombrozo say our drive to explain affects political polarization?Q5Does Jonathan Rottenberg think depression has a purpose?Q6How does Jonathan Rottenberg answer critics of his silver-lining view of depression?Q7Why does Jonathan Rottenberg say shared hardship can make depression easier to bear?
Transcribe your links. Paste a YouTube, Google Drive or podcast link and WhipScribe gives you the transcript. Transcribe a link →