podcasts / Hidden Brain / episode / question
Question

How does Tania Lombrozo say our drive to explain affects political polarization?

Answered from The Story of Stories · Hidden Brain · 2026-10-26

Tania Lombrozo says explanation can either fold new facts into existing beliefs or force a revision, and in politics it mostly does the first because political beliefs are tied to identity. People explain away inconvenient evidence, much as a scientist might blame a faulty microscope or a stereotype survives by labelling one person an exception. Her remedies are asking people to explain how a policy, such as a tax plan, works, and the strategy known as consider the opposite.

▸In their words

“Overwhelmingly it ends up being a force that allows us to assimilate things in the context of what we already believe.” Tania Lombrozo · at 39:30 — open in the transcript →

Source: our own transcription of the episode. The full conversation is on Hidden Brain (2026-10-26). Read the whole episode summary →

▸More from this episode

Q1What is the illusion of explanatory depth, according to Tania Lombrozo on Hidden Brain?Q2Why does Tania Lombrozo call conspiracy theories an error of over-explaining?Q3How do stories shape jury verdicts, according to Tania Lombrozo?Q5Does Jonathan Rottenberg think depression has a purpose?Q6How does Jonathan Rottenberg answer critics of his silver-lining view of depression?Q7Why does Jonathan Rottenberg say shared hardship can make depression easier to bear?
Transcribe your links. Paste a YouTube, Google Drive or podcast link and WhipScribe gives you the transcript. Transcribe a link →