podcasts / All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg / episode / question
Question

Why did Adobe's $20 billion Figma deal fall apart, according to Dylan Field?

Answered from Dylan Field: Is AI Replacing Designers?, Design is the New Code & Democratizing Creativity · All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg · 2026-10-19

Dylan Field said regulators in the United States, the European Union and the UK's CMA opposed Adobe's $20 billion purchase of Figma, and the review dragged on for 16 months before the deal ended. He does not believe the deal was anti-competitive and called the regulators' arguments poor, saying they were fighting past battles and defining markets by history rather than by where technology was heading.

▸In their words

“16 months of regulatory review for any company is punishing.” Dylan Field · at 8:13 — open in the transcript →

Source: our own transcription of the episode. The full conversation is on All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg (2026-10-19). Read the whole episode summary →

▸More from this episode

Q1Does Dylan Field think AI will replace designers?Q2Why does Dylan Field say AI is not raising the creative ceiling?Q3What did Dylan Field say about Anthropic's Claude Design and Figma?Q5How did Dylan Field keep Figma's team together after the Adobe deal collapsed?Q6Does Dylan Field think AI means SaaS is dead?Q7What is Figma's written-with-AI rule that Dylan Field described?
Ask your own recordings. Upload a podcast, a lecture or a meeting and ask it questions like this one. Transcribe with Whipscribe →