podcasts / Ryan Peterman / episode / question
Question

How did Stephen Toub review hundreds of thousands of lines of AI-written code?

Answered from Microsoft Distinguished Eng: Why And How To Port Your Entire Codebase to Rust | Stephen Toub · Ryan Peterman · 2026-11-02

Stephen Toub did not read every line and said doing so would be a waste, because agentic reviewers beat humans on line-level detail. He looked at every pull request for direction, architecture, componentisation and algorithms, and ran line-by-line reviews from three or four models of different families, often on every rebase. In the GitHub Copilot app's agent merge feature he lets agents rebase, fix CI and answer review feedback, but keeps the final merge for himself.

Source: our own transcription of the episode. The full conversation is on Ryan Peterman (2026-11-02). Read the whole episode summary →

▸More from this episode

Q1Why did Stephen Toub rewrite the GitHub Copilot runtime from TypeScript to Rust?Q2Why did Stephen Toub choose Rust over C#, Go or Java for the Copilot runtime?Q3How did Stephen Toub's incremental Copilot port compare with Bun's big-bang Rust rewrite?Q4How did Stephen Toub catch regressions when AI agents ported the Copilot codebase to Rust?Q5What did Stephen Toub say about AI agents changing tests to make code pass?Q7How much did Stephen Toub's AI-driven Copilot Rust port cost in tokens and time?Q8How does Stephen Toub decide whether a codebase rewrite or migration is worth doing?
Transcribe your links. Paste a YouTube, Google Drive or podcast link and WhipScribe gives you the transcript. Transcribe a link →