What did Shaan Puri think of Nathan Fielder's Elizabeth Holmes documentary?

Shaan Puri gave You Can See Everything a 10 and called it astonishing, while saying it is not the most enjoyable or satisfying watch. His main point is that the film shows Elizabeth Holmes at very close range for three hours and still leaves the viewer less sure of the truth than before.

Shaan Puri says the film is mostly shot in extreme close-up, which fits its title.
On the episode the film is described as the top-rated film on Letterboxd and Rotten Tomatoes and the first documentary favoured to win Best Picture.
Shaan Puri wished the ending were less abrupt and gave more resolution.

▸In their words

“It's not the most satisfying movie, but it's an astonishing movie.” Shaan Puri · at 51:20 — open in the transcript →

Source: our own transcription of the episode. The full conversation is on My First Million (2026-10-20). Read the whole episode summary →

▸More from this episode

Q2Does Elizabeth Holmes admit to lying in the Nathan Fielder documentary?Q3Who is Billy in the Elizabeth Holmes documentary, according to My First Million?Q4What evidence that Elizabeth Holmes committed fraud did Shaan Puri cite on My First Million?Q5Do the My First Million hosts think Elizabeth Holmes knowingly committed fraud?Q6What are Roy Cohn's rules of power that Sam Parr connected to Elizabeth Holmes?Q7How did Nathan Fielder use reenactments and Amanda Seyfried in the Holmes documentary?

Ask your own recordings. Upload a podcast, a lecture or a meeting and ask it questions like this one. Transcribe with Whipscribe →