podcasts / In Our Time / episode / question
Question

What did Eamon Duffy say about the manuscripts behind Erasmus's 1516 Greek New Testament?

Answered from Archive: Erasmus · In Our Time · 2026-10-19

Eamon Duffy calls the 1516 edition a shabby affair by modern standards of scholarship. Erasmus did most of the work in England with very few Greek manuscripts, some lent by John Colet from St Paul's. Lacking a complete Greek text of Revelation, he translated the end of the Latin Vulgate into Greek. Its importance was that a fresh, more accurate Latin translation sat opposite the Greek, so readers could compare them for the first time in a portable book.

▸In their words

“he probably used fewer than ten manuscripts, none of them earlier than the 11th century.” Eamon Duffy · at 22:38 — open in the transcript →

Source: our own transcription of the episode. The full conversation is on In Our Time (2026-10-19). Read the whole episode summary →

▸More from this episode

Q1Why did Erasmus call himself Erasmus of Rotterdam, according to Diarmaid MacCulloch on In Our Time?Q3How did Erasmus's translation of metanoete undermine the sacrament of penance?Q4What did Jill Kraye say Erasmus thought about pagan philosophers like Socrates?Q5Why did Erasmus first support Martin Luther and then break with him, according to Eamon Duffy?Q6How did Jill Kraye explain the free will debate between Erasmus and Luther on In Our Time?Q7What are Erasmus's Praise of Folly and Adages about, according to Jill Kraye?Q8How was Erasmus regarded by the Catholic Church after his death, according to Diarmaid MacCulloch?
Transcribe your links. Paste a YouTube, Google Drive or podcast link and WhipScribe gives you the transcript. Transcribe a link →