podcasts / In Our Time / episode / question
Question

How did Jill Kraye explain the free will debate between Erasmus and Luther on In Our Time?

Answered from Archive: Erasmus · In Our Time · 2026-10-19

Jill Kraye says Luther held that without grace people have no moral ability, while Erasmus held that free will cooperates with grace. His image is a toddler whose father holds him up as he walks toward an apple. The child could not reach it alone, but his desire to get there plays some small part. As an educator, Erasmus feared that denying any human contribution would remove the motive to be virtuous.

▸In their words

“it's really not the child's effort. He couldn't do it without the father.” Jill Kraye · at 40:40 — open in the transcript →
“If Luther is right, there's no Saint Socrates.” Eamon Duffy · at 42:01 — open in the transcript →

Source: our own transcription of the episode. The full conversation is on In Our Time (2026-10-19). Read the whole episode summary →

▸More from this episode

Q1Why did Erasmus call himself Erasmus of Rotterdam, according to Diarmaid MacCulloch on In Our Time?Q2What did Eamon Duffy say about the manuscripts behind Erasmus's 1516 Greek New Testament?Q3How did Erasmus's translation of metanoete undermine the sacrament of penance?Q4What did Jill Kraye say Erasmus thought about pagan philosophers like Socrates?Q5Why did Erasmus first support Martin Luther and then break with him, according to Eamon Duffy?Q7What are Erasmus's Praise of Folly and Adages about, according to Jill Kraye?Q8How was Erasmus regarded by the Catholic Church after his death, according to Diarmaid MacCulloch?
Transcribe your links. Paste a YouTube, Google Drive or podcast link and WhipScribe gives you the transcript. Transcribe a link →