podcasts / In Our Time / episode / question
Question

Why were neutrinos ruled out as dark matter, according to Carolyn Crawford and Carlos Frenk?

Answered from Archive: Dark Matter, the mysterious substance in space · In Our Time · 2026-10-26

Carolyn Crawford said neutrinos looked promising because they are real, plentiful and uncharged, but experiments put their mass too low, and being light they move close to the speed of light. Such fast hot dark matter would build huge structures first, while the real universe grew from small structures up. Carlos Frenk said his first 1980s simulations of a neutrino universe looked nothing like ours, his first big disappointment as a scientist.

▸In their words

“So the point about neutrinos is they travel too fast.” Carolyn Crawford · at 34:14 — open in the transcript →

Source: our own transcription of the episode. The full conversation is on In Our Time (2026-10-26). Read the whole episode summary →

▸More from this episode

Q1How do astronomers know dark matter exists if it gives off no light, according to In Our Time?Q2What did Anne Green say about gravitational lensing as evidence for dark matter?Q3Why do Carolyn Crawford and Carlos Frenk say dark matter cannot be ordinary matter?Q4What are WIMPs and why does Anne Green call them the best dark matter candidate?Q6How does Carlos Frenk simulate the whole universe on a computer?Q7How are scientists trying to detect dark matter particles directly, according to In Our Time?Q8When does Carlos Frenk predict dark matter will be discovered, and do the other panelists agree?
Transcribe your links. Paste a YouTube, Google Drive or podcast link and WhipScribe gives you the transcript. Transcribe a link →