podcasts / In Our Time / episode / question
Question

Why do Carolyn Crawford and Carlos Frenk say dark matter cannot be ordinary matter?

Answered from Archive: Dark Matter, the mysterious substance in space · In Our Time · 2026-10-26

Carolyn Crawford said the first suspects were dim ordinary objects such as planets, gas clouds, brown dwarfs and black holes, known as baryonic matter. Any of them warmer than absolute zero would emit radiation, and in the quantities needed today's detectors would have seen the glow. Carlos Frenk added the clinching argument: the cosmic microwave background measures the amount of ordinary matter to an accuracy of about 1 per cent, and it falls far short of the total mass.

▸In their words

“It's a really precise measurement with an accuracy of 1%.” Carlos Frenk · at 27:48 — open in the transcript →

Source: our own transcription of the episode. The full conversation is on In Our Time (2026-10-26). Read the whole episode summary →

▸More from this episode

Q1How do astronomers know dark matter exists if it gives off no light, according to In Our Time?Q2What did Anne Green say about gravitational lensing as evidence for dark matter?Q4What are WIMPs and why does Anne Green call them the best dark matter candidate?Q5Why were neutrinos ruled out as dark matter, according to Carolyn Crawford and Carlos Frenk?Q6How does Carlos Frenk simulate the whole universe on a computer?Q7How are scientists trying to detect dark matter particles directly, according to In Our Time?Q8When does Carlos Frenk predict dark matter will be discovered, and do the other panelists agree?
Transcribe your links. Paste a YouTube, Google Drive or podcast link and WhipScribe gives you the transcript. Transcribe a link →