podcasts / Dateline NBC / episode / question
Question

Why did Andrew Griffin's defense say his best friend's testimony could not be trusted?

Answered from Children speak at father's sentencing. Business partner on trial for double murder. Plus, manhunts. · Dateline NBC · 2026-11-05

Griffin's childhood best friend testified under an immunity deal that he helped plan the killings, suggesting a motorcycle and a rain suit to avoid leaving DNA. The defense told jurors the friend could not be believed because he has since been sentenced to three life terms for sexually abusing a child. It argued every prosecution witness was unreliable, that no physical evidence linked Griffin to the scene, and that Tom carried large amounts of cash and kept shady company. The jury convicted Griffin on all counts after about four hours.

Source: our own transcription of the episode. The full conversation is on Dateline NBC (2026-11-05). Read the whole episode summary →

▸More from this episode

Q1What sentence did Larry Millete get for the murder of Maya Millete?Q2What did the online spellcaster testify in the Larry Millete murder trial?Q3What happened at Larry Millete's sentencing hearing in Chula Vista?Q4Why was Andrew Griffin charged with killing Tom and Angela in Belmont, Ohio?Q6How do U.S. Marshals track down escaped prisoners, according to Lenny DePaul?
Transcribe your links. Paste a YouTube, Google Drive or podcast link and WhipScribe gives you the transcript. Transcribe a link →