In Our Time · · Transcript & summary by WhipScribe
Three film historians take apart the industrial, political and personal machinery behind a film most people think they already know, and correct several of its favourite legends along the way.
Tap a chapter to open that moment in the transcript; the link to it is copied for you.
“The ability to bring together these disparate elements and to weld them together into something so that you don't notice the joins.” Ian Christie · at 25:19 — open in the transcript →
“In Hollywood grammar, a fade to black indicates a longer passage of time than a dissolve.” Sheldon Hall · at 38:51 — open in the transcript →
Recorded in front of an audience at the Crossed Wires Festival in Sheffield, this In Our Time panel treats Casablanca as the product of an industry at full stretch. Sheldon Hall sets the scale: in 1940 Sheffield alone had 54 cinemas, Britons went roughly every ten days, and each major studio released 25 to 50 films a year, so story departments bought material fast. That is how Warner Brothers came to pay $20,000 for an unstaged play, Everybody Comes to Rick's. Ian Christie adds that war was good business too, since home attendance rose even as Nazi Europe closed foreign markets.
The making of the film is the panel's second strand. Pamela Hutchinson traces how émigrés and refugees from Nazi-controlled Europe filled the cast and crew, and how the screenplay passed through many hands, from the Epstein twins to Howard Koch, with Bogart and producer Hal Wallis each contributing famous lines. Hall corrects the casting myths about Ronald Reagan and George Raft and explains how the Production Code reshaped the love story, while Christie credits Michael Curtiz with fusing melodrama, music and film noir so smoothly that the seams vanish.
The third strand is politics. Hutchinson reads Rick's neutrality as a rebuke to American isolationism and the songs as a lesson in acting rather than waiting. The guests describe the Office of War Information's questions for producers, the decision to keep the film from North African audiences, and its cool reception in France. They end on irony: figures who made this anti-fascist film later faced the House Un-American Activities Committee, and Bogart had to retreat from his protest. A 1970s Woody Allen play and heavy television rotation kept the film in circulation for new generations.
Film historian and Emeritus Fellow at Sheffield Hallam University, introduced on the programme as the panel's local guest at the Crossed Wires Festival in Sheffield.
Sheldon Hall says no, not realistically. Reagan was named as the lead in a Warner Brothers press release in the first week of January 1942, just after the title changed from Everybody Comes to Rick's, but Reagan later said nobody at the studio had spoken to him. Producer Hal Wallis had Humphrey Bogart in mind from the start and the film was written for him.
Pamela Hutchinson describes the screenplay as a studio collaboration. It began with the play by Murray Burnett and Joan Alison, then the twin brothers Philip and Julius Epstein wrote much of the sharp dialogue before leaving for propaganda work. Howard Koch strengthened the politics, Lenore Coffee added intrigue, Casey Robinson added romance and the Production Code forced subtler wording.
Sheldon Hall explains that the Production Code Administration had the late-night reunion of Rick and Ilsa end in a dissolve to a searchlight tower rather than a fade to black. A fade implied more time had passed, and so more opportunity for sex. Hall adds that in the original play Ilsa was an American called Lois Meredith who went to bed with Rick at once, which Hollywood could not show.
Pamela Hutchinson says As Time Goes By, an existing song rather than one written for the film, carries the memory of Rick and Ilsa's Paris romance and is woven through Max Steiner's score. She contrasts it with Knock On Wood, the one original song, whose cheerful advice to sit tight is exactly what the film argues against. The American standards Dooley Wilson plays mark Rick's Cafe as a small outpost of America.
Pamela Hutchinson says the film was aimed at the American public, not President Roosevelt, and sells the case for joining the war through Rick's personal choices. His claim that he sticks his neck out for nobody is contradicted by his past fighting Mussolini in Ethiopia and Franco in Spain. Ian Christie points to moments such as Rick rigging the roulette table for a young Bulgarian refugee couple as steps back towards his anti-Nazi instincts.
The In Our Time panel explains that the Office of War Information blocked screenings in North Africa on the advice of Robert Riskin, Frank Capra's screenwriter, who was then an executive in its overseas branch, because of the likely French reaction. America still had diplomatic relations with Vichy France when the film was made, and the studio worried about that market.
The panel says people behind the film were later attacked under the ironic charge of 'premature anti-fascism', for having believed Hollywood was too slow to warn against the Nazis. Humphrey Bogart, they note, helped found the Committee for the First Amendment and led a delegation to Washington defending free speech, but was then forced to publicly walk back his stand.
The In Our Time panel credits the film's qualities but argues its revival owed much to Woody Allen's Play It Again, Sam, filmed in 1972, in which a ghostly Bogart advises Allen on romance. That introduced Casablanca to younger viewers who had never seen it. Television then took over: the panel cites it as the most requested film on American television, with about a 73% audience share on its first New York broadcast.
Our own transcript of the public episode, with a timestamp about every 90 seconds. Tap a timestamp or the link button on a paragraph to copy a link that opens this page there.
0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. Claude isn't just for quick questions. Hand it a whole task like turning a folder or scattered notes into a report and it does the work and hands back something finished that you can open and edit. Claude can now draft a doc or deck right in front of you and Claude Design now lives right inside Claude. Describe the website or prototype you're picturing, attach your design system and it comes back in your own design language ready to edit right on the canvas. It works with your files and the tools you already use like Gmail and Slack and whether you're debugging code at midnight, building a financial model or strategizing your next business move, Claude extends your thinking to tackle the problems that matter. For problems
0:59worth solving, get started with Claude at claude.ai slashsolve. That's claude.ai.solve. And check out Claude Pro, which includes access to all of the features mentioned in today's episode. claude.ai.solve. What if you could get more from what you already do? As a Shell Fuel Rewards member, that's just a regular weekday afternoon. You get more rewards, more savings, and more special offers. Earn rewards when shopping, dining out, and fueling up. And all of that becomes fuel savings when you're at the pump. Find the Shell app on your phone and enjoy life with more. Your nearest Shell station is less than five miles away. At PNC Wealth Management, our brilliantly boring investment philosophy is designed to help create
1:49confident investors. These investors may go on vacations where they wear floral shirts unbuttoned generously or pose for pictures that look like they're holding up ancient architecture using only their finger. Though we are not responsible for any of this, we are proud to provide comprehensive financial planning services designed to help clients achieve their goals. So we're sorry, and you're welcome. PNC Wealth Management member Finn Recipic. Results vary by customer and are not guaranteed. This is one of more than a thousand episodes that you can find in the In Our Time archive. A reading list for this edition can be found in the episode description wherever you're listening. I hope you enjoy the programme.
2:35Hello. Casablanca is one of the greatest films from Hollywood's golden era, with Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergman and the unforgettable song As Time Goes By. Casablanca came out in 1942 when Europe had been at war for three years and the USA for one and was among Hollywood's first major films to explain to US audiences why the war was worth fighting and still be a box office hit. And with a cast and crew full of emigres and refugees from lands now under Nazi control, it has an authenticity as well as an astonishing emotional power that continues to this very day. Which is why we're here at the Crossed Wires Festival in Sheffield to discuss Casablanca with Ian Christie, Emeritus Professor of Film and Media History at Birkbeck College,
3:30Pamela Hutchinson, Film Historian and Critic, and Sheldon Hall, Emeritus Fellow at Sheffield Hallam University. Please welcome them all. Thank you very much and I'm going to start with our local boy our guest Sheldon Hall. Sheldon can you tell us how big Hollywood was in the early 1940s both in the US and here in the United Kingdom and Europe? I'll try to make it local and explain it that way. Where we're sitting here in Sheffield, in 1940, there were 54 cinemas available within the city and in the surrounding districts and suburbs. 54 separate cinema buildings. And how many are there now? There are five multiplex cinemas with a total of 54 screens in them. You might say, well, what's the difference? 54 screens, 54 cinemas, so what?
4:33Well, the difference is size, partly location and design of the buildings, but also the fact that the cinemas today are much, much smaller. The largest auditorium in Sheffield today, which is just over 500 seats, is smaller than the smallest cinema in Sheffield in 1940, where the average was about 800 to 1500 seats. Some of them had 2,000, 2,500. And that was needed because people went to the cinema far more often than they do today. I think the average is every person in the UK went to the cinema far more often than they do today. I think the average is... Every person in the UK goes to the cinema once or twice a year now. In the 1940s, people went to the cinema every ten days on average. Of course, some people wouldn't go at all,
5:17but some people would go a lot more often than that. So there was a habit to sustain. And so Hollywood produced a lot more films than it does now hundreds every year every every major studio had between 25 and 50 films released the British studios competed didn't make quite as many as that but there was a need to sustain a regular supply of movies so that people would go to the cinema week in, week out. So Warner Brothers, the studio which made Casablanca, they picked up a script, Everybody Comes to Ricks, which was a stage play, but this was before Pearl Harbour. The play hadn't even been performed. So why were they looking at plays like Everybody Comes to Ricks? Every major studio had a department, a story department, So why were they looking at plays like Everybody Comes to Ricks?
6:05Every major studio had a department, a story department, which would actively seek out material. They would scour the listings of theatres, they would have regular contact with literary agents, they would have deals with publishers to look at unpublished books in their galley-proof form. And so there's a constant need for a supply of material. Everybody Who Comes to Ricks was written before Pearl Harbor, as you say, but it was submitted to Warner Brothers the day after Pearl Harbor. And three days later, a reader, a studio reader at Warner Brothers, reported on, gave a summary of the story, and reported that it was a box office natural. Timely, suspenseful, sophisticated hokum, excellent melodrama.
6:53These were some of the phrases from the reader's report. So it had all of the kinds of ingredients that they were looking for in that particular time, as well as just in general. So what happened at the time is that you'd have these scouts scouring all sorts of plays, books, films, anything. And they paid quite a lot of money for this script, didn't they? Even though it hadn't been produced. Yes, as an unproduced play, it was bought for $20,000, which I think was a record at least for the studio it could have been a lot more had it been a successful play but they got a good deal thank you Sheldon Pamela Hutchinson how interconnected were Hollywood and the Europeans at this time in the lead up to the in the leadup to the Second World War?
7:47Well, ever since the First World War, Hollywood had been the dominant producer of films across the world, and so territories in Europe are watching Hollywood films as much as people in America. And Hollywood had such power and influence that they would hire the best European talent. So that's how we get, in Europe, directors like Ernst Lubitsch and Michael Curtis, how we get stars like Marlene Dietrich. And this process continued. So that's how Ingrid Bergman made her way to Hollywood. David O. Selznick's assistant, Kay Brown, was in New York, and the lift operator in her apartment block said, my Swedish family and all my Swedish friends are watching this film called Intermezzo, with this wonderful star.
8:26And that's how she was picked up. They brought her over to Hollywood, remade the film and launched her as a star. But there's this other and I think more relevant to Casablanca way in which European talent came to Hollywood at the time. And that's obviously because in the 1930s, when the Nazi regime was installed, many Eastern Europeans, Germans, Jewish people, gay people fled their home countries and came to Hollywood. So you have a wave of émigré talent who have already excelled in another industry and who have a reason to be in Hollywood that is really quite a terrifying situation for them. And so there's a kind of parallel between the glamour of the Casablanca milieu where all these refugees are drinking champagne cocktails
9:12and gambling and listening to music while they're fighting for their lives with the fact that people came to Hollywood to work on sophisticated hokum. But out of very real reasons billy wilder famously said you know all the optimists died in the concentration camps and all the pessimists have swimming pools in beverly hills you know billy wilder was one of those emigres who came from vienna i believe and yeah and so many of the cast of casablanca conrad weitz from germ Germany, Paul Henry, Peter Lorre, they came in this way. So we've heard that it's a natural hit according to the reader. How did Warner Brothers go about fashioning this script for film and to turn Everybody Comes to Ricks into Casablanca?
10:00And I have a hidden motivation for asking this question because I also want you to tell us a bit about the plot. Okay, so I'm not going to give away the ending, but I think everyone here probably has seen it. Okay, so it's set in Casablanca. It's a visually controlled Morocco. It's some point before Pearl Harbor. And in Casablanca is where people are gathering because they want to get out of Africa and to Lisbon to then cross to America to get out of Europe and to safety and a lot of people gather in this very glamorous bar called Rick's Cafe which is owned by a man called Rick Blaine played by Humphrey Bogart and he is studiously neutral in affairs of the heart and matters of war and then one day in walks to his gin joint obviously uh ingrid
10:47bergman playing his old flame ilsa and she is now married to a freedom fighter victor laszlo played by paul henry and this situation is complicated by the fact that we know that rick has got these mystical letters of transit a sort of free pass for anyone to get out of europe and into america how and and in what formation is he going to use these that's what we want to know right because letters of transit, a sort of free pass for anyone to get out of Europe and into America. How and in what formation is he going to use these? That's what we want to know, right? Because, of course, Victor Laszlo is this legendary freedom fighter, anti-Nazi resistance fighter, and those letters of transit could be very, very helpful to him.
11:20Oh, yeah. He's a wanted man. If he gets to America, he could save the world, right? So do you get the girl or do you save the world? And the script itself, how did they manage to write that? Because it's just full of fantastic zingers, one-liners, you know, time after time. As time goes by. Oh, yes. It's a phenomenal script. And although in the context of the subject of Casablanca collaboration isn't the word that we were championed that is exactly how it was done and that's how Hollywood excelled during its golden age. So there were many many authors of this screenplay. The authors of the play Murray Burnett and Joan Allison and then the assignment was given to the Epstein brothers, two twins, Philip and Julius, who really were
12:05responsible for many of those great lines, the crackling dialogue. They then left the project to work on some straight propaganda. And a writer called Howard Koch was brought in. And he really emphasized the political dynamic of this story. And then we have many other people getting involved. Lenore Coffey, a well-known screenwriter she added a little bit more drama and intrigue a script reader called casey robinson added a little bit more romance the good officers of the production code uh necessitated several changes to the dialogue to make things more subtle and suggestive humphrey bogart absolutely improvised the line he is looking at you kid uh he just just said it to Ingrid Bergman one day,
12:46one of the few times he spoke to her. Unfortunately, true. And as all stories of the Hollywood system must end up with, it was the producer, Hal B. Wallace, who came up with the famous final line. Sorry for the people who haven't seen it, but it's something about a beautiful friendship and it does end the film well. I re-watched the film and I've just got to, there was one line which I'd forgotten, which is just so fantastic. Captain Renault, played by the spectacular Claude Rains, says, what in heaven's name brought you to Casablanca? And Rick says, my health. I came to Casablanca for the waters. Captain Renault, the waters, the waters were in the desert. Rick, I was misinformed. Ian Christie, why had Hollywood held back from denouncing fascism until quite late?
13:42Well, you could argue that they hadn't really held back, but it's a process that starts. There are obviously a lot of really well-informed people in Hollywood who are very politically alert, not just the émigrés, but also lots of, you know, internationalists who are working in Hollywood and, of course, the enormous cast of talent from Europe that had arrived. But they're always thinking about, you know, the audience cast of talent from Europe that had arrived. But they're always thinking about the audience. Will it play in Peoria? One of those old phrases. If you get too far ahead of the audience and start talking about distant wars and far-off issues, unless there's a drama at the centre of it, it won't work.
14:22So there's a kind of, I would say, there's a steady build-up of alerting people. And very often it's done in the form of, I mean, romantic stories. Somebody is rescued from Europe. Clouds are forming over Europe. A man rescues a woman. And that sense that Europe is in danger is growing during the 1930s. And as we get closer to 1939 39 the outbreak of war in europe and closer to pearl harbour so the tempo builds and there's an extraordinary film which i think is a real you know prelude to thinking about the the politics of casablanca which is a film called hold back the dawn which i would strongly recommend to anyone who hasn't come across it. It's by a director who is not as well known as Michael Curtiz, his name is Mitchell Lyson,
15:12but it's written by Billy Wilder. And in that film, you've got a distillation, I suppose, of what Americans needed to know about the threat from Europe, because it's not set in America, it's set in Mexico, and it's about a bunch of desperate people who are trying to get into America. And one of those is a cynical gigolo, played by Charles Boyer, who latches onto an apparently innocent American woman, Olivia de Havilland, and hopes to marry her and so get into the States. And what Wilder was doing was distilling in that film the desperation that people had to get to somewhere safe. And of course it's a situation that we can see being reflected again and again in history right up to the present.
15:56But so audiences were not unaware of the dangers in Europe, the tide of refugees heading towards America and safety by the time Casablanca was made. You mentioned Michael Curtis, the director. I think his original name was Curtis Mihaly, Hungarian, or even something else. He had several versions of his name. Several names, but he came from Hungary, as I understand it. With this, they'd already got the script, they'd chosen the principal actors. Why did they then approach Michael Curtis for this film? Well, the simple answer is he was one of the most efficient directors in Hollywood. Michael Curtis, however you choose to pronounce it, is legendary in the annals of film history because he directed more films than anybody else,
16:48well over 100. By the time he was headhunted by Hollywood, as Pamela explained, he'd already directed 64 films, I think, in Hungary. I mean, he was the founder of the Hungarian film industry back as far as 1912. And so he'd moved to Germany and he was a natural for the bosses of the Hollywood studios. By the time he arrived in Hollywood, he was a superb craftsman and he was amazingly efficient. I mean, he could knock out four or five films in a year. He did most of his time. And the interesting thing about Curtiz is that there's a very famous critic, Peter Wallen, who put his finger on it. He said that Curtiz always found the right style for every different genre, every different subject that he tackled.
17:36So if it was a swashbuckler with Errol Flynn, he created Errol Flynn. Michael Curtiz was right there on the quarterdeck. If it was a romantic film, he was there. If it was a musical, he was there. He could turn his hand to anything. And so, you know, it wasn't that he was the perfect person for this, although he turned out to be. It was more that, of course, we want Mikhail, Michael, Mike, he was known actually in Hollywood, to do this film. So we have Curtiz, as I now know that we pronounce it, Sheldon Hall. We have Curtiz as the director. But before that, the studio had selected Bogart and Bergman as the two lead characters. Why were they considered so bankable? They were not quite as bankable in 1942 as they later became because of Casablanca.
18:27Bogart had been under contract with Warner Brothers since 1936, and he'd made something like 50 films before he got to this point. He was never a star until the early 1940s. He was famously cast as the villain, the snarling villain opposite other actors like James Cagney, Edward G. Robinson, George Raft, or he was the lead in low-budget B-movies, but he was never a romantic lead. And the studio was looking to develop his star persona. He'd become a star because of two films that George Raft famously and hilariously had turned down, High Sierra and Maltese Falcon. Bogart plays a gangster with a heart in High Sierra and a hard-boiled detective with a sensitive streak in the Maltese Falcon. So they were looking to kind of put together all these elements of Bogart's persona,
19:19but also add a romantic dimension which he hadn't previously had before. And so Casablanca was built up quite specifically as a vehicle for Bogart. There are some stories that it was originally intended for Ronald Reagan. There was in fact a press release that came out in the first week of January just after the title had been changed from Everybody Comes to Ricks to Casablanca, in which indeed Ronald Reagan had been named as the potential lead. We dodged a bullet there. Reagan later said he knew nothing about this. No one talked to him at Warner Brothers. He was another contract actor. No one had told him that he was being considered for this part. And in fact, the key figure in all of this is really Hal Wallace,
20:01who we've already mentioned, the producer who developed the project and who picked Burgard as his favoured lead. The other myth around the casting is that the studio had originally thought of George Raft for the part. Now, George Raft was already a bit of a has-been by this point. In fact, the reverse is true. Raft had gone to Jack Warner, the head of the studio, and said, I hear you're making Casablanca. I'd be interested in being the lead for this. And Warner had gone to Wallace and Curtis and said, what about George Raft? We've got him under contract. He wants a more important film. And Wallace and Curtis huddled and said, no way. There's no possibility of Raft being cast. This film is being written for Bogart. It's ideal for him.
20:48So there was never a possibility realistically that anyone else was going to be the star. And indeed it became his most successful film by far at this point and remained so for probably the rest of his career really. Pamela has already mentioned Ingrid Bergman as having had a start in Hollywood with Intermezzo in 1939. She was on a much lower plane than even Paul Henreid I think at this point. She'd had three other films after Intermezzo. She was waiting for a big role in For Whom the Bell Tolls. That was the film that she really wanted to do and she hadn't yet been cast in it. She was under contract, personal contract, to David O. Selznick, the producer of Intermezzo and Gone With the Wind.
21:30And so when Warner came to him, not to her, asking for, if she was available to appear in Casablanca, he gave the OK and he got the money. So he would pay her a regular salary. Pamela, we've heard the film described as hokum, but we've also heard of it described as a melodrama. So what does a melodrama mean? And what sort of conventions were at play here? A melodrama in the 1940s in Hollywood, as the way to define it, would often call it a woman's film or a woman's weepy. And I think a lot of people know these kind of films they were hugely popular in the 1940s all throughout the wartime period female-led stories with very strong stars in them much more famous than Ingrid Bergman you know and
22:17people like if you take as an example Warner Brothers had just made Now Voyager with Betty Davis in the lead but of course also with paul henry and with claude raines and that follows a lot of the kind of melodrama conventions in that we have a woman played by betty davis who she has a kind of a life outside of society because of her relationship with her mother she can't get married she can't enter into sort of the life she wants and when she finally gets that opportunity, she has this romantic meeting. She falls in love with Paul Henreid. They smoke cigarettes together. She proves herself to be the perfect partner for him and also the perfect mother for his child. And yet, I'm so sorry to the audience,
22:56but I have to spoil it. She does have to give that up in the end. She cannot have that. And it's always about looking at the things you want, particularly the classic Hollywood happy ever after and denying it and being kept away from that particular pleasure so we can see in Casablanca that Rick has this love affair it is rekindled he has the opportunity to escape and build a new life and yet at the end he makes a more noble sacrifice yeah we don't mind about giving spoilers for now voyager by the way so if you want to do um ian christie so it's been described as melodrama but it's also at the very height of the film noir genre um there's a lot of seediness a lot of low life here desperate desperate people on the run.
23:47How does that turn into entertainment? Well, you know, there was a period when film studies, serious study of popular cinema, got very hooked on genre theory. And masses of books and articles and conferences were held about melodrama. It became a subject. But I think it's important to stress that actually Hollywood never dealt in straightforward genres, really. Okay, westerns, perhaps, at the limit. But all Hollywood movies are a mixture of genres, really. And all successful Hollywood movies definitely are a mixture of genres. That was Hollywood's secret, the ability to meld together traditional melodrama, women's weepies, with historical subjects, with action, and as you rightly say, with what became known as film noir. It's interesting that the term film
24:38noir, French, was actually coined by French critics when they saw all the American films of the early 40s. After the war, the films that couldn't be released while France was occupied were suddenly released in an avalanche in France. And French critics said, but these are film noir because they're all dark. Dark, literally, shadows, dark subjects, dark themes, dark characters. And yes, to us today, it's obvious that Casablanca is predominantly a film noir with melodramatic elements, perhaps. I mean, you don't have to categorise it, but it's a supreme example of what I would describe as the genius of the system, the ability to bring together these disparate elements and to weld them together into something so that you don't notice the joins.
25:26You really don't spot the joins. And there are many joins in the film. And this is where Curtiz's direction really comes into its own, because if you look at it, the camera work, the shadows, the use of light in dark situations, it's a masterclass, really, isn't it? Pools of light, bigger pools of darkness. One of the things that had attracted Hollywood's attention to Curtiz way back in the 20s was his moving camera. He was one of those pioneers who moved the camera. He was famous for his high shots. The camera would come swooping in on a crane. You don't see so much of that in Casablanca, but it's still there. He's a very mobile director, and he can bring life to a scene which could otherwise be static.
26:12And, you know, there's some... I mean, just one example, if I can pick out another example. I just realised this when I re-watched the film, like many of us recently. There's a single shot right at the beginning. We don't see much of Casablanca in the film. Casablanca is quickly forgotten and we're inside Rick's place, as it were. But we see as part of that opening flurry of shots a poster of Marshal Pétain, the leader of Vichy France. And nowadays you can freeze frame on it. Audiences wouldn't have been able to do that, remember, but actually the slogan on the poster says, I keep my promises. It's quite chilling. It's the motto of Vichy France. And there it is, right at the front of the film,
26:59just to remind you that the wartime situation. Well, talking about Vichy France, Sheldon, let's go to what some critics consider the very heart of the film, which is the Marseilles scene. Can you tell us what that's about, why it's there and what is it? Why is it so important? It reminds us, among other things, that apart from being a melodrama and a thriller and this and that, it's also a musical. And there are about 20 musical numbers in the film. And obviously the film is best remembered for as time goes by. But the political centrepiece, oddly enough, of was a way of activating the sentiments of the audience around occupied France and, you know, defiance of the Nazi regime. So just briefly, what happens in
27:54that scene? To set it up in the film, in Rick's cafe, a group of Nazi soldiers led by Conrad Veit are singing in German, Wacht am Rhein. And the resistance leader played by Paul Henry, Victor Laszlo, hears this, goes out to the band in the cafe and instructs them to take up La Marseillaise. And the band leader looks rather nervously at this and glances at Humphrey Bogart and we get a quick shot of Bogart nodding to say, yes, it's okay. And so the band contributes a performance of La Marseillaise in competition with Wachter and Rhein. And of course, the audience joins in with it and eventually drowns out the Nazis who give up so there's a kind of battle of song that takes place between the two forces with
28:52Laszlo triumphant the Marseilles triumphant and the crucial point about this is that it it's the only point in the film really where Laszlo comes into his own he's a boring old stick for most of the movie he's the least interesting of all the characters in the movie but this is where he shines because the film has to demonstrate he has to demonstrate his power to inspire to be a great leader to gather people behind him it really is quite moving and almost hairs down the back of your neck when you see the Marseilles be sung. What a patriotic motivation that is. It's a huge success, that scene. And equally moving, not only for people in the audience, but for the actors on set, many of whom were French refugees,
29:39including, you know... Do you want me to mention Madeleine Lebeau? Go on, mention Madeleine. Who we get a close-up of the tear-stained face Do you want me to mention Madeleine Lebeau? Go on, mention Madeleine. We get a close-up of the tear-stained face of one of the principal cast, Madeleine Lebeau, who was herself a fugitive from France. As was her husband who played the croupier. Yes, Marcel Dalio, who plays the croupier in the film, was her real-life husband. Pamela, can you tell us, broaden that out a bit, about the function of music in this film in general, not just the Marseilles scene? The Marseilles scene, as Sheldon rightly points out, takes place inside a very musical film. And as Ian said, Hollywood isn't necessarily rigorously sticking to genres,
30:21but there are conventions that people would expect from films of this time. And very often, in the course of any hollywood film in the 1940s they'll walk into a nightclub and stop to listen to a musical interlude and that is just multiplied several times in casablanca when we first enter rick's cafe uh dooley wilson who plays sam who's such an important character in the film is playing it had to be you He's playing American music and the repeated use of American standards in the cafe makes it clear to us that we are meant to consider Rick's Cafe as a kind of outpost of America, that this is a little American domain because it's run by Humphrey Bogart, which is about as patriotic as the film gets.
31:03So the main song that they build up to playing, that they tell us is going to be difficult for the characters to listen to, is As Time Goes By. And this was not an original composition. And Max Steiner, who wrote the score for the film, hated this song and was very vocal about having this schmaltzy, sentimental tune. There's even a story, which is probably not true, that he almost persuaded the studio to reshoot the whole film with a different song. But being lumbered with, as time goes by, a song that many of us will find very beautiful, not least when Ingrid Bergman hums it to Dooley Wilson, which is a really haunting moment, he works it into the film. So we hear it played, and we hear it coming back in snatches on the score.
31:45So this idea that it into the film. So we hear it played and we hear it coming back in snatches on the score. So this idea that it represents the love story between Rick and Ilsa, their previous romance in Paris, is built, saturated into the film. And it's really wonderful. It works against our better instincts. We are being fully manipulated into finding it romantic. There's also one song that was written originally for the film, probably everyone's least favourite song in the film, which is a very jaunty number called Knock On Wood. And it feels quite jarring, and you hear that quite early on in the film. The people in Rick's Cafe are singing along to this song that says, if you've got trouble, just knock on wood.
32:21And I think we're meant to discount this song. We're meant to say that it's wrong from the beginning because the the more the moral of the film is going to be that when you are in a time of trouble you don't just sit tight and hope for the best that you have to act so we have this sort of suggestion of what not to do braying at us in this rather all too cheery manner what we really have to do is think about as time goes by and remember the past. I mean, it's kind of... It's a conversion film, if I can come in, because I think that's a really interesting point you make about the difference between those two numbers. Because really, if you think about what's the underlying plot of the film, it's about how Rick, who is shown as a cynic,
33:04but he's a cynic with a background. He's got a reason to be cynical. He's been in two wars before. He's been running guns in an earlier war in North Africa, and he's been involved in the Spanish Civil War. Yes, we'll come to this point about the politics in a minute. But before we do, what about the business aspect of the studio? So Warner's in the business of making money. Is wartime an opportunity or is it a problem because they have to adapt to what perhaps the government, perhaps society is expecting? It's an opportunity. If you look at the pattern of film attendance, it basically rises through the 40s. The 40s is the peak of film attendance all over the world, really. Of course, people are watching different films.
34:03So in the Allied world, they're watching Hollywood Hollywood predominantly but increasingly they're watching British made films. That's another story too. But Hollywood has lost part of its foreign market with Hitler coming to power, the Nazi takeover. American films are out. It's a major foreign market. So it's lost some market. And foreign earnings were important to the Hollywood studios. But it's also gained increased adherence, attendance, searching for entertainment in its home audience. So interference, yes. What's happening is that there is... Hollywood has always presented itself as apolitical, but there's a back story to this, that during the slump, the depression, Franklin Roosevelt made an appeal directly
34:55to the bosses of the Hollywood studios to get behind the New Deal. And although many of them were not of his persuasion, politically or economically, they did. And so some of those great musicals of the early 1930s, the Gold Diggers musicals, for instance, are actually responses to the Depression. Because they show people making do and coping with the difficult situation in America. So Hollywood retains that kind of sense of, yes, ultimately they will back the direction of travel. And when America, of course, is in the war, when Pearl Harbor happens, they're absolutely 100% in support of our boys, our girls, our country. And so there's a very interesting kind of pivot going on here. It's a business opportunity, but it's also a patriotic opportunity to show how patriotic
35:46they can be. Thank you, Ian, for that. Sheldon Hall, the United States was actually quite a censorious place at the time. What concessions did Warner Brothers have to make for the censors? Because this is a very sensual film as well. One of the main reservations that was expressed by Warner executives to whom Hal Wallace showed the synopsis of Everybody Comes to Ricks was that some of the material was highly censorable. In the play, Ilse Lund, the character played in the film by Ingrid Bergman, was actually called Lois Meredith, and she was an American. And she was played as a bit of a floozy. And the first thing that happens in the play is that she falls into bed with Rick. And you couldn't do that at all in a Hollywood movie
36:36unless the character was played by Barbara Stanek, in which case maybe. But you'd have to be very indirect about it. And so one of the things the writers had to do was to filter out a lot of the kind of censorable material and find indirect ways of communicating what was actually going on on the screen. And one of the key figures in that is Captain Renault, the Claude Rains character, who was given some quite near-the-knuckle lines or his activities in respect of some of the women who he encounters. He's quite clearly extorting them for sex as a way of getting visas or money. In the film, and that had to be toned down a little from the play and from the original screenplay, or drafts of the screenplay.
37:31What's the most famous bit in terms of the censorship and how you get around it? In the film? There's a scene about two thirds of the way through in which Ilsa and Rick meet late at night and they eventually renew their love for one another, it seems. And as they reconcile, as they embrace and kiss, there is a dissolve. In other words, the picture turns into another picture. And the shot that immediately follows that embrace is, it's like a search tower with a light around it. It's, in other words, a phallic symbol. And then it dissolves again to Rick standing in a window. I'm not sure that he's actually smoking a cigarette. People smoke a lot of cigarettes in this movie. He's not at that particular point.
38:19That scene transition was actually the result of the interference of the Production Code Administration, which was the trade body responsible for seeing that scripts and films complied with censorship regulations. Originally, the film had a fade to black at the end of the embrace. And the censor asked for it to be changed to a dissolve. And you think, well, what's the difference? Because in Hollywood grammar, a fade to black indicates a longer passage of time than a dissolve. In other words, they would have had more time to get up to something naughty if there was a fade to black. And so the dissolve replaced it. And there's been a lot of debate ever since about the significance of that search tower image
39:06and how much you can read into it. And the point is that suggestions are provided for the audience to go away and make up its own mind. And various critics have pointed out that two people sitting next to one another, seeing the same film, could come up with an entirely different interpretation of what actually went on there. Well, look out for that next time you watch the film and see how you interpret it. Sometimes we all need an extra helping hand, especially with a tricky business problem you've been putting off. Claude is the AI for just that. It's the collaborator that understands your entire workflow and thinks with you, not for you. And Claude isn't just for quick questions. Hand it a whole task,
39:52like turning a folder of scattered notes into a report, and it does the work and hands back something finished that you can open and edit. Claude can now draft a doc or deck right in front of you, and Claude Design now lives right inside Claude. Describe the website or prototype you're picturing, attach your design system, and it comes back in your own design language, ready to edit, right on the canvas. It works with your files and the tools you already use, like Gmail and Slack. And whether you're debugging code at midnight, building a financial model, or strategizing your next business move, Claude extends your thinking to tackle the problems that matter. For problems worth solving, get started with Claude at claude.ai slash solve. That's claude.ai slash solve. And
40:37check out Claude Pro, which includes access to all of the features mentioned in today's episode. Claude.ai slash solve. What if you could get more from what you already do? When you're a Shell Fuel Rewards member, you can. So your weekday afternoon could be filled with more rewards, more special offers, and definitely more savings when you're fueling up your car. When you join, you'll save 10 cents per gallon on your first fill, 20 cents per gallon on your second, 30 cents per gallon on your third, and more savings on every fill after that. There are no extra steps and no changes to your routine, just more value built into it. You earn rewards when shopping and dining out, and you always save more at the pump. So wherever your day takes you, you get a little more out of every stop along the way with Shell.
41:28Join the Shell Fuel Rewards Program in the Shell app on your phone and enjoy life with more. Your nearest Shell station is closer than you think. PNC Bank brings you Call of the Wild Money Moves You hear that? YOLO That's an internet troll telling you to put all your money into a single investment YOLO YOLO YOLO He wants you to liquidate your emergency fund YOLO And buy a digital racehorse named Silicon Steve YOLO Stay vigilant, he's very persistent YOLO. And buy a digital racehorse named Silicon Steve. YOLO. Stay vigilant. He's very persistent. YOLO. Guard against wild money moves with PNC Bank. Brilliantly boring since 1865. Ways to Well was designed for people who were done starting over.
42:18Actually, that was before I changed my diet. My sleep's been better for months. No, I've explained this before. At Ways to Well, your clinician sees your health history, lab data and goals together. So every conversation can start further ahead. Choose your care plan and get started at ways2well.com. That's ways, the number two, well.com. Pamela, actually from the very beginning of the film, there are references to Rick not caring about politics and indeed specifically to isolationism. How effective is Casablanca in combating the ideology of isolationism, which was very present in the United States at the opening of the war? So, I mean, it's quite clear, obviously, that this film was made for the public,
43:17the American public. It wasn't made for the commander-in-chief. He'd obviously already made his decision. So this is about selling the idea of what is the value of being involved in the war and they use words like isolationism and foreign policy quite heavily in the film but often in regards to people's personal situations they're not necessarily having conversations about politics and rick has this pose where he says i don't stick my neck out for anybody he says that a couple of times and he you know he doesn't drink with customers and he doesn't take sides on the war and we see through various bits of information as Ian mentioned earlier this is completely not true he may not be acting on his impulses but he he has a very strong he really is on one side rather
44:01than the other and he talks to a fellow cafe owner who wants to hire his piano player and he says, well, I don't buy and sell human beings. We know he's been in Ethiopia fighting against Mussolini, fighting against Franco. He talks about being on a blacklist even. We know he has this past of action. So the toughest thing he ever says is he tells some Nazis that they wouldn't have a very good time if they tried to invade New York City but he is stuck in this this idea that the best thing for him to do is to be neutral but in this film we see again and again that passivity is amoral right so Ian what is the key scene where he appears to recognize that his retreat into isolationism is not sustainable and not moral?
44:49Well, I think it's articulated through a series of moments. I mean, when we see him, there's a crucial moment when he rigs the game, the gambling game, so that the young couple can make enough money, the young refugee couple. From money. The young refugee couple. From Bulgaria. From Bulgaria, precisely. I think we should just say in passing that the range of Eastern, Central European nationalities, identities that is represented in the film is extraordinary. I think I've counted up to 40 people from Europe who appear in the film. And about half of those were recent immigrants into America. So really, the film is peopled with characters who represent what is actually happening over there in Europe.
45:37Rick gradually moves towards a situation where it's very clear that his old sympathies, his old alliances, his old gut instincts to be anti-Nazi comes to the fore. And he knows that he's got to help Victor Laszlo and as a great potential, great leader to get out with his wife, namely Ingrid Bergman. We see lots of other films coming out in 1942 and 1943 by American studios promoting participation in the war against Germany. There was William Wyler's Mrs. Miniver, To Be or Not to Be, the comedy directed by Ernst Lubitsch, Fritz Lang's Hangman Also Die. I've got a couple of questions on this. Several of these films suggest that the audiences would have known very well what was happening in Europe,
46:30especially to the Jewish populations. And yet after the war, there was an argument that we didn't realise what was going on in the Holocaust. And yet these films seem to counter that, that people would have known. Have you got any thoughts on that? We've mentioned Ernst Lubitsch and the film that he made and Charlie Chaplin also made The Great Dictator and both of these directors said, you know, they made these films but had they known the scale of what was going on, they would not have made them. And so there's a sense, if you look at the newspapers at the time, there are reports on concentration camps but they're not giving the full story that we know now. So I think one of the strengths of Casablanca
47:07is it makes these very references. You mentioned the poster of Pétain, and it mentions concentration camps, but looking back at it now, we have a fuller, more difficult, and perhaps a far more difficult story to put behind the film. So, Sheldon, you wanted to come in. Ernst Lubitsch, the director of To Be or Not To Be, which you mentioned, had said that... which is a comedy set in Central Europe, and he said afterwards, had he known what was going on in the concentration camps, he would not have been able to make the film. He would simply have been paralysed by the severity of what was going on. Because it was a comedy. I mean, To Be or Not To Be is extraordinary from that perspective that you can make a comedy
47:50about what's going on in Warsaw in 1939, 1940. Quite astonishing, really. But really important to do, I think, as a comedy. I was talking recently about the man who was actually the production designer of To Be or Not To Be. That was Vincent Korda, who was the brother of Alex Korda. And the Kordas had moved to America. They were Hungarian. Alexander Korda, of course, the founder of London Films. Precisely. They were the classic Hungarians who created the British film industry or recreated the British film industry. But they moved to America in the 1940s to complete Thief of Baghdad, the film that they'd started in Britain. They could see that making a technicolor fantasy wasn't going to be possible under wartime
48:37conditions. And they stayed in America, or at least two of the brothers stayed. And Vincent contributed to a whole series of anti-fascist films as an art director. And I was just looking at the scenes that he made for To Be or Not To Be, and it's quite chilling when you think about a Jewish-Hungarian refugee, in effect, doing the decor for a Nazi state. And Vincent's brother, Zoltan Korder, who was also active in the film industry and was a director, made a number of films in Hollywood in the 1940s, including Sahara in 1943 with Humphrey Bogart, which is a classic kind of lost patrol platoon movie in which the patrol represents a kind of microcosm of the Allies. So you have some American soldiers, you have some German soldiers, you have a sympathetic Italian,
49:34all coming together to fight the Nazis. And do we know how much pressure the US government and the Office of Information was imposing on Hollywood to get behind the war effort? Well, they had a series of seven questions they wanted film producers to answer. And the very first question is, will this picture help win the war? So if you're going to refer to the war, it has to be in this very specific way. And it goes on to sort of talk about wholesome representation. So you have a level of encouragement and a push it doesn't really affect a film like Casablanca because it was sort of made too early but yeah going forward if you're going to make a work that's going to be seen by so many people such a huge swathe of the American and worldwide population that it's very important that we're
50:23all singing from the same Allied hymn sheet, despite whatever decisions people came to later. The other concern, which now seems bizarre in retrospect, is that they were worried about how the film would play in Vichy France. Because at the time the film was made, America still had diplomatic relations with Vichy France. And it was a foreign market. They were worried about how it would go down and how the government would respond to it. Rightly, I think, because actually I just checked at several French encyclopedias and collections of critical writing. Guess what's missing from most of them? Casablanca. I have a sneaking suspicion, which I will confirm later, I hope, that actually Casablanca did not play very well even in post-war France
51:09because of the representation of Vichy France. The OWI actually prevented its being shown in North Africa, oddly enough, on the advice of Robert Riskin, who is best known as Frank Capra, screenwriter, which he became an executive with the overseas branch of the OWI, and it was suppressed because of the likely French reaction to it. Pamela? I was looking at some of the reviews of the film when it came out, and when film reviews tended to talk about the message of the film rather than the romance, the intrigue, they said, and it's anti-Vichy, or good on it for having a pop, as it were. Vichy said, that is what I think the critics were taking from it rather than let's all join the war effort. It was that critical tone.
51:51Now, one of the surprising things about many of the cast and crew in this film is a few years later, they were hauled up in front of the House of Un-American Activities, the McCarthy witch hunters, as it's been called. Why were they accused of being un-American when they had produced this extraordinary cultural icon? There's this extraordinary phrase, which is so ironic, premature anti-fascism. And that was one of the phrases that was used to pillory the right thinking. They didn't need to be very leftist to be right thinking figures in Hollywood who believed that Hollywood had been too passive and too late in many ways in getting the message out because it was such a powerful ideological machine.
52:44So yes, of course, when HUAC, the House Un-American Activities Committee, got underway, among its leading opponents were Humphrey Bogart. Yeah, and Humphrey Bogart was very vocal against HUAC, and he was one of the founders of the Committee for the First Amendment, and they led this delegation to Washington DC. He wrote this article article he spoke very brilliantly about how he wasn't interested in whether people were communists or not he just cared about free speech the kind of American values that ostensibly you know the war is fighting for and he was forced to recant all of it he had to walk back and say no communism is serious and I shouldn't have got involved and despite being forever captured on film as the
53:24heroic man who stuck his neck out in real life, even with the stardom that he had at that point, he had to walk back because the atmosphere was so paranoiac. Sheldon, one of the paradoxes about this film is it is a marvellous example of ensemble filmmaking, notwithstanding the presence of Bogart and Bergman. And yet, the people involved barely spoke to each other off screen. Why was that so? Why were they all so miserable? From all accounts, it was a very difficult production because it was continually being rewritten as the movie was going along. And so they gave various accounts about how confused they were about the course of the narrative. Ingrid Bergman in interviews afterwards said that she never knew who
54:15she was going to end up with. That she didn't know what the ending was going to be. And I think you have to be a little sceptical towards that because the ending is in the play. And in all of the script drafts, incomplete as they were, the film ended up in the same way. What was called the sacrifice ending, whereby Rick gives up Ilsa for a greater good, a greater cause. But how they get there was the difficult bit. Making it plausible that Ilse would leave Rick, the love of her life, and fly off with Victor Laszlo. And so the screenwriters and the director and producer focused on trying to make that work, to make it plausible that she would behave as they do. But offscreen, Henry was jealous of Bogart.
55:02Henry doesn't come out of it well because he seems to have been a bit jealous that he was not the lead. That's Victor Laszlo, the actor playing Victor Laszlo. He claimed afterwards that he had it in his contract that he would get the girl in all the films that he made at Warner Brothers. Indeed, it absolutely didn't. It's not true at all. It's not true that he had it in his contract either. But it's also a tribute to the power of the film, isn't it? That we want to believe in this entirely imaginary community which is Rick's Café. It is astonishingly believable and you can see interviewers who, Ingrid Bergman gave many interviews and I was looking at one made many years later in which the interviewer clearly wants her to say that they were one happy band.
55:49And she said, well, no, they weren't. We hardly spoke to each other. But that's the power of the film, that we want to believe that they have a sort of life and even relationships off screen as well as so powerfully on screen. The question that's often asked is why Casablanca has become one of the world's favourite films. Yes, why does it stand out above all else from the wartime films? I mean, I think its qualities are very considerable, but we should remember that actually it got revived for much younger people when Woody Allen made it the subject of a play, Play It Again, Sam, which is also the source of the misquotation, the famous misquotation of the title. And when that was filmed in, what, 72?
56:32It's got a, for those who don't know it, it's got a kind of ghostly Bogart figure who appears to Woody Allen and gives him advice about his romantic life. And I think that reinvented the film for a lot of people, especially for much younger people who had never seen it first time round, probably had never even heard of it. The fact that Woody Allen was kind of making it this legendary film in the 70s must have done a lot, I think, to carry it on down through the generations. And then, of course, comes video and TV, and it got shown a lot on television. Yes, apparently the most requested film shown on American television. It got something like a 73% audience share when it was first shown on TV in New York.
57:15It was one of the most requested films by broadcasters as well as by the audience. And, of course, it has all of these memorable lines, which are quoted by other films. It's incredible that we've got through this discussion without actually falling into a quotation, a semi-quotation. In fact, I'm shocked. What with these usual suspects. If you're interested in Hollywood history, you probably listen to a podcast called You Must Remember This. I mean, if you would listen to it in our time first, obviously. But yeah, you know, it's absolutely everywhere in our understanding of how we imagine a Hollywood golden age film to be. Well, thank you very much for coming. In Our Time with Misha Glenny is produced by Simon Tillotson and it's a BBC Studios production.
58:07If you've enjoyed the podcast, please share the show with your friends. If you're in the UK, you can access episodes 28 days early by subscribing to In Our Time on BBC Sounds or watching on BBC iPlayer. If you're outside the UK, you can listen on bbc.com or wherever you get your podcasts. This cultural life from BBC Radio 4. I will never go into anything so deep like that again. The world's leading artistic figures reveal their creative influences. Disobey, disagree, disavow. I'm John Wilson and my recent guests have included the sculptor Anish Kapoor, photographer Annie Leibovitz, the actor Kristin Scott Thomas... It has made me good at telling stories about people who have a secret suffering.
58:53...and former children's laureate Frank Cottrell Boyce. If art's got one function it's to point to what's wonderful and say, look, this is your world, it's insane. Listen to This Cultural Life on BBC Sounds. Sometimes we all need an extra helping hand, especially with a tricky business problem you've been putting off. Claude is the AI for just that. It's the collaborator that understands your entire workflow and thinks with you, not for you. And Claude isn't just for quick questions. Hand it a whole task, like turning a folder of scattered notes into a report, and it does the work and hands back something finished that you can open and edit. Claude can now draft a doc or deck right in front of you,
59:39and Claude Design now lives right inside Claude. Describe the website or prototype you're picturing, attach your design system, and it comes back in your own design language, now lives right inside Claude. Describe the website or prototype you're picturing, attach your design system, and it comes back in your own design language, ready to edit, right on the canvas. It works with your files and the tools you already use, like Gmail and Slack. And whether you're debugging code at midnight, building a financial model, or strategizing your next business move, Claude extends your thinking to tackle the problems that matter. For problems worth solving, get started with Claude at claude.ai slash solve. That's claude.ai
1:00:11slash solve. And check out Claude Pro, which includes access to all of the features mentioned in today's episode. claude.ai slash solve.





