podcasts / In Our Time / episode / question
Question

Why does the filioque clause divide the Orthodox and Western churches, per Martin Palmer?

Answered from Archive: Trinity · In Our Time · 2026-10-08

Martin Palmer explains that filioque means the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. The phrase is not in the creeds of Nicaea in 325, Constantinople in 381 or Chalcedon in 451, and it entered Western usage from around the 6th century, probably in Spain. The Orthodox churches refuse it because it makes the Spirit derivative of the other two, bringing a hierarchy into the Godhead.

▸In their words

“It produces a subservient Holy Spirit.” Martin Palmer · at 28:28 — open in the transcript →

Source: our own transcription of the episode. The full conversation is on In Our Time (2026-10-08). Read the whole episode summary →

▸More from this episode

Q1Where did the idea of the Trinity come from, according to Janet Soskice on In Our Time?Q2What was the Council of Nicaea in 325 trying to settle, according to Martin Palmer?Q4What does Andrei Rublev's Trinity icon mean, according to Martin Palmer on In Our Time?Q5How did Julian of Norwich describe the Trinity, according to Janet Soskice?Q6Why do Judaism and Islam reject the Trinity, according to Martin Palmer?Q7Why did Isaac Newton and other Unitarians reject the Trinity, per Janet Soskice?Q8Why did the Trinity matter to 20th-century theologians, according to Graham Ward?
Transcribe your links. Paste a YouTube, Google Drive or podcast link and WhipScribe gives you the transcript. Transcribe a link →